Weblog
Friday, August 29, 2008
-
Currently Reading
Putting Amazing Back into Grace: Who Does What in Salvation? (Hodder Christian Paperbacks)
By Michael Horton
see relatedPassive aggressive people in leadership
How many times have leaders been termed meek or wise when they are really passive aggressive ?
A passive/aggressive personality is one of the most common psychiatric disorders. It's exact prevalence is difficult to estimate because of the number of subclinical and borderline cases and the number of cases with definite disability who fail to seek professional attention. A passive/aggressive person habitually reacts negatively to the express wishes of others, but usually demonstrates this resistance covertly rather than openly.
The term "passive/aggressive" implies two assumptions about the cause of this type of recurring negative behavior:1. The individual is afraid, unable, or unwilling to express aggression openly; or
2. The person has a pervasive feeling of hostility toward others.
Passive/aggressive individuals are usually inwardly aggressive. Outwardly, they express their aggressive tendencies through a passive facade. Inwardly, they desire control over the events that affect their lives, but they fear that if they show this desire openly, they will be put down. This fear creates a strong defensiveness and outer phoniness, which eventually turns into anger. However, passive/aggressive individuals fear being vulnerable, so they repress their anger and express it in subtle, nonverbal, crafty ways.The passive/aggressive personality develops when a child is being reared by at least one controlling parent. The second parent is often absent from or inactive in the home. This usually involves a domineering and controlling mother and an absent, weak or passive father (who may exhibit much different traits at work). Such parents overprotect their child, make excessive demands on him, respond to him with mixed reactions of acceptance and hostility and fail to meet his basic trust and dependency needs.
All of this fosters a helpless and clinging attitude in the child and inhibits the development of independence. Expecting other people to gratify all his needs, the child grows up dependent on others to protect him and aid him in daily responsibilities. He tends to have a low tolerance for frustration and stress.
This personality type develops as an expression of resentment against excessive parental demands. The parents usually do not allow the child to openly express hostility. The child then learns to meet unfulfilled needs and to vent anger and depression through more subtle means of rebellious behavior. Such children soon learn that negative behavior (nail biting, bed-wetting, eating problems, procrastination, pouting, obstructionism, stubbornness and intentional inefficiency) will at least get them attention. Passive/aggressive children also may cause problems at school, violate rules and fight frequently with other students. By their teenage years they may lean toward an antisocial personality, engage in delinquency, drug usage, and theft or other misdemeanors.
Often the passive/aggressive assumes a role of chronic submissiveness and compliance, but beneath the unassuming facade may be a great deal of hostility and resentment. They find it difficult to say "no," and they dislike making major decisions. They catch themselves making excuses for delayed decisions and behavior. Problems surface in their relationships with authority, with society's demands and with the needs of others in close, personal contacts. Feeling helpless, unwilling to be alone or make decisions, they look to others—usually to just one other person—for direction and to take responsibility on their behalf. They learn to accomplish their goals through passive manipulation.
The Balanced Passive/Aggressive
The balanced passive/aggressive tends to serve and submit wholeheartedly and effectively to authority.
The Unbalanced Passive/Aggressive
Unbalanced passive/aggressives tend to be stubborn, uncooperative, negativistic and frustrating when others ask something of them. Their favorite phrase is "yes, but . . ." When given advice, they usually set out to show that it won't work for them by following a "failure script." Unbalanced passive/aggressives can also be overbearing, inconsiderate, late and careless in their work. They have a basic problem with anger or hostility, outbursts of temper, low self esteem, an unrewarding domestic life, tenuous friendships, little awareness that benefits must be earned and not just received and an ambivalent relationship with their mothers (protective or punitive).
Patterns of Behavior Often Exhibited in Passive/Aggressive Personalities:Obstructionism – A passive/aggressive woman, for example, who is angry at her husband over an incident that happened on Saturday night, may be obstructive on Sunday morning by being late in getting ready for church, especially if her husband is compulsive about being on time. Without being consciously manipulative, she may be unable to find her lipstick or shoes, causing a delay, and passively expressing her aggression toward him.
Pouting – After a disagreement, a passive/aggressive person will pout and walk away. Frequently, the only comment will be, "I don't want to talk about it."
Procrastination – A passive/aggressive son, when asked by his mother to mow the lawn, may express his hostility by putting it off or "dragging his feet."
Intentional Inefficiency – When the son can no longer get by through procrastination, he may exhibit intentional inefficiency, another method of passively expressing aggression. He mows the yard, but intentionally does a poor job. If, as a result of that inefficiency, he is relieved of the task, he has learned how to avoid responsibility.
Addictive Behaviors – Rebellious behavior may later come in the form of excessive eating, drinking, smoking or the use of addictive substances. A majority of cases of both drug addiction and alcoholism stem from a passive/aggressive personality disorder. According to research and clinical findings in treating hundreds of alcoholics and drug addicts, more than half have strong passive/aggressive traits. The addictive habits do not have to involve substance abuse. Sometimes they are habits such as eating only certain kinds of food, sleeping more than ten hours a night, spending too much time alone, preoccupation with reading or any introversive activity which prevents them from spending time with others. These all result from the passive/aggressive's lack of willpower in caring for his personal problems and the resulting dependency on others to solve his problems. A sense of inadequacy and falling short of the traits they believe are needed for approval creates increasing psychological pressure, for which a person eventually will seek an outlet. When a healthy outlet cannot be found, the passive/aggressive will resort to an unhealthy one. People involved in any addictive habit are looking for some type of relief from current or long-term psychological stress.
People Pleasing – Because they need so much nurturing and cannot tolerate criticism, passive/aggressives seek to please those on whom they depend. The threat of any loss brings on anxiety. Unable to handle any personal tension, they seek an infantile and blissful state. They suffer anxiety when separated from their parents, sometimes developing a phobia to school and making a fuss to stay home. A passive/aggressive personality is often developed by the youngest child of the family, or by the youngest child of his or her sex. When passive/aggressives grow up, they may perform well when told what to do, but still have difficulty in making decisions. Most of them feel inferior and unable to measure up to standards of independence and make mature choices on their own. They were taught, often unconsciously by their parents, to depend on others to make hard decisions and take action for them.
Finding a BalanceAll individuals with passive/aggressive tendencies can work on problem areas if they decide they really want to change, genuinely commit their motives to Christ and persevere in relinquishing old patterns. If you are passive/aggressive, you can:
Remove Your Blinders – A passive/aggressive needs to acknowledge hidden emotions such as anger, fear and the hidden desire for control. This involves realizing that you are in a battle against deception and denial within yourself. You might find it helpful to memorize Romans 2:16 and Proverbs 28:13.
Turn Your Emotions over to God – This invites surrendering your deepest emotional secrets to God and requires the inner searching of the Holy Spirit. Through this you can overcome some of your deepest personal fears and replace them with trust in God. In most cases the barrier to your emotional stability is the desire to control. Because of this, you impose a long inner list of "shoulds" and "oughts" on family and friends. If you can replace the desire for control with the attitude of accepting others as they are, you will diminish your inner personal stress.
Turn Actions over to God – It is necessary to allow God to scrutinize every motive and to "coat" every action in your life. Determine how your hidden anger is expressed. It is also healthful to resolve to use your knack for being clever and persuasive in unselfish ways.
Become Independent and Learn to Make Your Own Decisions – This involves taking full responsibility for personal behavior and not blaming things on someone else. For example, you can learn to become more tidy and stop expecting others to pick up your messes.
Learn to Like and Appreciate Yourself in Christ – You must realize you are created and loved by God and can find happiness and fulfillment through a life-commitment to Him.
Learn to Refuse the Easy Way out – You can learn to refuse the easy way out of painful situations and to develop willpower or self discipline rather than setting yourself up to fulfill a "failure script." God sets a standard for us that is higher than we would ever set for ourselves, and yet He promises that we can attain it by achieving our full potential and allowing Him to use His power through us.
Overcome Selfishness – This can be done by helping others and getting involved in their lives.
Why Assertiveness?
Why is assertiveness the option of choice in dealing with conflicts in our relationships? First, assertiveness is efficient in getting problems resolved. Of all other options, assertiveness is the most likely choice to get the job done and to enhance the relationship. When we "react" passively, the problem has not been dealt with and the conflict obviously doesn't go away. When we handle conflict aggressively, the conflict might get "resolved" for the moment, but the way it got resolved (at the expense of another's feelings and rights) often leads to further rebellion and conflict down the road. Passive/aggressive behavior is also inefficient in solving a conflict because it is indirect and deceitful (Eph. 4: 25, 26, 29, 31 & 32).
Second, assertiveness is the only option that helps build self esteem in the relationship. When we handle things passively, aggressively, or passive/aggressively we really aren't acting in a manner that is worthy of respect. Acting assertively, with each person treated with dignity, raises the self esteem of each person involved. The assertive person's self esteem rises because he is acting in a manner that is worth respecting, and the person on the receiving end feels better about himself because he is being treated respectfully and as if he really matters. Assertive behavior is the option of choice because it is more efficient and helps to raise the self esteem of everyone involved. It was the behavior that the Lord Jesus Christ manifested in His own life. The paradox, though, is that while assertiveness is the best route to go in dealing with conflict, it is the least practiced. Why?
Why Don't We Act Assertively?
While there are many reasons we avoid being assertive, the main reason is that most of us have a high need for approval. We don't stand up for ourselves because we feel the person with whom we are being assertive will dislike or reject us in some way. The truth of the matter is that assertiveness will be met with disapproval by others at times. Anytime we dare to stand up for how we feel or what we believe is right, the potential is there for others to resent us for doing so and put us down in some way.The life of Christ is a perfect example of assertiveness. He assertively told His parents He must be about His Father's business. He assertively confronted the disciples when they got out of line. He often was quite assertive with the rulers and leaders of His time.
The assertive style of Christ led to some strong reactions at times, even to the point that He was put to death. But He didn't back off just because some people didn't like what he was saying or doing. We need to accept the fact that we will not be liked or accepted by everyone all the time. We can ask the Lord Jesus Christ to make us resilient people. The need for full approval that many of us carry around inside ourselves is a very serious stumbling block to being assertive. Christians especially struggle with this because they have misconstrued the Bible to say that a "true Christian" lets people run over him and does it with a smile. Many Christians have a strong "standing up for yourself is selfish and sinful" tape in their minds that keeps them from being assertive.
While meekness is an important Christian trait, boldness is just as Scriptural and is evident in the lives of many Biblical characters. Until we come to grips with why we need approval from others so badly, we are likely to keep "stuffing" what we really feel and fail to be assertive. This leads to feelings of low self worth and confusion about who we really are. The stakes are high. It is important that we work on our need to please everyone all the time and the lack of assertiveness that this creates within us.
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
-

Currently Listening
Go
By Newsboys
see relatedSheep without Shepherds
Jesus recognized the burden that was being placed on sincere believers in His time, who just wanted to do what is right. He saw them as sheep without a shepherd, even though they were involved in the religious rituals in the temple and synagogues.
They were bewildered (harassed and distressed and dejected and helpless), like sheep without a shepherd.
—Matthew 9:36 AMPIn his book, Exposing Spiritual Abuse, Mike Fehlauer points out that Jesus saw these dear people as harassed: “This word conveys the idea of some outside force pressing upon the people, causing them to feel weary, distressed and downcast. This outside force was the religious system that placed its emphasis on outward appearances. It was a system that promised peace based on one’s ability to follow the prescribed rules and regulations. If one failed, then there was judgment.”“Not having a shepherd didn’t mean that the people lacked for those who told them what to do,” he continues. “There were plenty of Pharisees willing to do that. It meant they had no one to lead them to spiritual green pastures. A shepherd doesn’t drive his sheep as cattlemen drive their cattle. A shepherd leads his sheep to a safe place where food is plentiful and where they can find rest.”
The term shepherd is an Old Testament metaphor as well. Ezekiel 34 contains an exhortation in which the Lord holds the leaders of Israel responsible for failing to care for the flock:
Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy and say to them, “Thus says the Lord GOD to the shepherds: ‘Woe to the shepherds of Israel who feed themselves! Should not the shepherds feed the flocks?You eat the fat and clothe yourselves with the wool; you slaughter the fatlings, but you do not feed the flock. The weak you have not strengthened, nor have you healed those who were sick, nor bound up the broken, nor brought back what was driven away, nor sought what was lost; but with force and cruelty you have ruled them. So they were scattered because there was no shepherd.’”
—Ezekiel 34:2–5Today we have many preachers but few pastors. Do these preachers realize God considers their congregations as sheep without shepherds? Perhaps if they recognized how God viewed the situation, they would change their ways. Perhaps not.
Monday, August 25, 2008
-
Saving faith and living faith
This morning I was reading a post about a man's son coming forward to accept the Lord at the Portland Music Festival and the thought of rejoicing with those who rejoice really was impressed upon me, as the desires of a parents heart comes to fruitation. This summer, I was blessed to witness several thousand people make a commitment to Christ in June, and then participate in a event in July where I was able to disciple a man in his 70's who made a recommitment , and then in August seeing people seeking the Lord's face for direction in their lives for full time Christian Service and to be sought out by a young Christian band who had played at a service I spoke at in July are just things that I can not fully and adequately describe in English.
After reading the post today, I was able to thank Good that He had restored my ability to rejoice about these times, rather than having tohave to examine them through a theological parsing strainer. You see, about two years ago I started realizing I was so caught up in theological correctness that I was missing out on much of living faith. I got so wrapped up in soteriology and how God operates I was missing out on a large portion of the Christian faith. I came to the realization that God is doing His part just fine, it is us Christians who need to refocus on our part in the Kingdom .
This summer I got to experience the joy of young people pouring their hearts out before the Lord, crying over one anothers shoulders and was able to share that joy and those feelings with them. The joy, the renewed hope that with God all things are possible. I also found that it was quite biblical that I should be rejoicing with them . In fact, Jesus taught in Luke 15:3-10 (see also Matthew 18:12-14)
7 Just so, I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance…10 Just so, I tell you, there is joy before the angels of God over one sinner who repents.”
About two years ago, I really started to think about the insanity of all sides who get up in "half the truth" defenses and debates. I mean, how many think that Christianity is only about heaven? I started to realize that at some point I had to get from the class room to the field, and start affecting the community I live in and to offer my talents to the Lord for His purposes, not to win a theological war that was in existence when I was born and will carry on until the Lord's return.
If our primary view of Christianity is simply to get to heaven, then there is hardly a compelling reason to press on . However, God’s plan and purpose only begin there. Saving faith grows into living faith in which you learn to trust God always and in every circumstance.
People who have been consistently growing in their living faith have a quiet confidence that is unshakable in the face of obstacles, opposition and delays. With regard to God’s promises in their lives, it is more than just believing or hoping; it is an inner knowing, This is what Hebrews refers; “Faith is the assurance of things hoped for; the conviction of things not seen” (11:1 NASB)
God’s plan and purpose for each of us is that we develop living faith and grow in our living faith. This is a choice and something we must choose to do. All soteriological debate ends here because the Bible is clear once one is saved then he needs to do certain things, not for salvation, but to fulfill their purpose in His Kingdom. He left His people work to do, far beyond debate. (In fact, he even mentioned that we are not to be quarrelsome among ourselves)
Living faith is an active choice that each and every Christian is called to develop. How many times have you seen the “seasoned saints” whom it seems nothing shakes them, not trail or circumstance will change their demeanor nor change their inner countenance? To them the conviction of things not seen is as natural to them as seeing the tangible world is for the rest of us. You don’t just wake up one day and have this type of living faith, it comes after a process of time of trusting the Lord with all things and having the faith described in Hebrews 11:1. A working faith, not a mystical one. Soli Deo Gloria.
Saturday, August 23, 2008
-
What is the church?
In the New Testament (NT), the church is actually the ekklesia (Greek). The problem is that “church” is not a helpful translation of ekklesia. In the world of the NT, the ekklesia was a socio-political term, an assembly of people called together to discuss and decide civic issues. It had no special religious significance. It’s interesting that Jesus and the NT writers selected this word to describe the special “called-out” community He founded. Under the Holy Spirit’s inspiration, they apparently wanted to stress the communal side of Christian experience, not so much a “religious” or cultic side. After all, they didn’t identify this new community chiefly as “the temple” or any such thing. There is a total absence of any religiosity in the Greek and Roman idea of the ekklesia, and there is no religiosity in the NT idea of it either. It is the local, called-out followers of Jesus joined together in assembly.The real distinctive of the church is that they are the followers of Jesus — as opposed to the rest of the world, which does not follow Jesus. This is probably why ekklesia was chosen to describe this congregation in the first place (1 Cor. 11:18; 14:23, 26). It is an assembly called out from the world for a particular purpose. It designates a distinction from the world of unbelievers — the church is distinct from the world.
This congregation is under Jesus’ authority (Eph. 1:20-23). He places human leaders in this assembly. They are called elders or bishops (Tit. 1:5-7). The assembly is called to follow and obey them (Heb. 13:7-17), but they are servants and may never lord it over the assembly (1 Pet. 5:3). They are not “priests,” in an a way more “spiritual” than the other believers, who are priests also (Rev. 1:5-6). They are not a member of some spiritual caste system; the Bible knows nothing of clericalism. They are specially gifted (Eph. 4:7-16), but they are not of a different order than their sisters and brothers (“laypersons”). Their goal is simple but often hard — oversee the spiritual health of the “flock” (1 Pet. 5:1-4).
Second, the only church the Bible knows about is local. In the NT era a city would have a church, usually planted by an apostle or another elder (Ac. 14:23; 15:41; Rom. 16:4; 1 Cor. 4:17). It was a local church. In Hebrews 12:23 we read of the ekklesia registered in heaven, but even here it is visible and localized [!]. Sometimes the Bible uses “church” in a generic sense, as we would of the family, as in, “The family is under attack in today’s world.” The Bible uses the term “church” in this way (Ac. 8:3; 1 Cor. 10:32; 12:28; Eph. 1:22), but it is the local church being talked about. The only church is this local assembly or congregation.
This means that the Roman Catholic Church is not a church. Neither is the Southern Baptist Convention, the United Church of Christ or the Lutheran Church-Missouri-Synod. Neither is the OPC, the PCA, the CREC, the URC, the PRC, the ELCA, the RCUS, the RPCUS, the RPCGA, the CRC, the RCA, or any of the rest of the Protestant ecclesial alphabet soup. An assembly of believers from around the state or nation is not a church. A collection of ministers and elders from a denomination is not a church. These are all human organizations, and they may be useful in the Kingdom of God (see below); but they are not the church, and they should not act as though they are the church. They have no elders, no deacons, and do not enjoy the promises that God granted His church (e. g., Mt. 16:18-19). Now, it’s possible that the true church may have met in different houses, portions at one spot and portions at another in a city (Rom. 16:5; Col. 4:15). But if it isn’t local, it’s not a church.
Nor is the church “invisible.” The ideas of the “invisible church” arose when men had to deal with the problem of sinners and depravity and apostasy in the church. “How could a church that contains sinners and apostasy be the bride of Christ, the blood-washed body the Bible talks about?” It is a good question, but it should not have been answered by creating a new category the Bible knows nothing about: the “invisible” church. The Bible knows only about very visible, local churches — nothing else. True, there is an invisible dimension of the church — the true believers seen to God’s eyes alone. But this is no church the Bible knows anything about, and we shouldn’t act as though there’s a separate “invisible” church.
The Church is Not the Kingdom
There are two final problems — (1), when the church claims to be something it is not; and (2) when things that are not the church claim to be the church.
Let’s take these in order. One of the most injurious errors in the history of Christianity is when the church is identified with the Kingdom of God. Jesus said very little about the church and very much about the Kingdom, and He did not equate the two. Nobody else in the Bible did, either. This is just a fiction dreamed up early in the Western church in the attempt to conform it to the structures of the collapsing hierarchical Roman Empire by which it was surrounded, and this view was later passed on to the Protestants (and even in the Westminster Confession). The church is a local assembly of Christians, but the kingdom is the rule of God by Jesus in the world, wherever that may be (1 Cor. 15:23-28). The church should not try to monopolize these aspects of the kingdom. Sometimes I hear well-meaning Christians say, “All ‘para-church’ ministries are anti-Biblical.” They have yet to find a Bible verse for this assertion. They believe that if the church isn’t doing it, it shouldn’t be done. The problem with this is that God’s plan in the earth is bigger than the church, which is to be sure a vital part of it. The family is a basic ministry in God’s plan. It should be a part of the church, but it is not the church. It has its own calling separate from the church (Gen. 1:26-28). The same is true of the state (Rom. 13:1-7). It is not a part of the church, though it is God’s minister and subject to His authority. The state should be a part of the Kingdom of God in Jesus, yet it is not the church. “Ecclesiocentricity” (church-centeredness) subverts the Lordship of Christ by arrogating to itself tasks and institutions beyond its purview. So, the church is not the Kingdom.
The church (ekklesia) is God’s called-out assembly of Jesus’ followers, his blood-washed people under His Lordship and governed by elders. It is local. All Christians should be members of a local church. The church is not the Kingdom.
-
Perpetual Reform or Static Tradition ?
Reformed theology is a wonderful thing precisely because it is about reforming. If we insist on dismissing or ignoring those with whom we disagree because they are not Reformed enough or progressive enough, then our scripture and tradition will soon be revealed as little more than idolatry. I am troubled by the logic of “God loves who I am, therefore everything I do must be OK, too”. I am also troubled by proof-texted responses that claim to offer “grace” (as if grace was ours to offer) while assuming a “clarity” of the biblical witness that most bible scholars consider erroneous. We can do better than this. We must do better than this.Christianity is already considered irrelevant by too much of our culture, a dying institutional refuge of a very frightened people. What is so sad is that our enormous fear appears to come from a deep uncertainty regarding the gospel we proclaim–a dark and secret belief that God does not really claim each of us as beloved; and so we rush to choose sides and defend positions without carefully embracing the mystery that is revelation in the presence of a God and creation worthy of our trust and awe.
If behavior is an outward manifestation of deeper reality, then sin is not so much about legalism and the particularity of acts but about what we believe an act reveals about us, about God . . . and God with us. This is the stuff of nuance, not simplistic conclusion. Whatever topic we are discussing, let us do so with a large dose of humility and responsible, scriptural contextuality so that we can be heard as relevant and inviting voices in a skeptical but still hungry world. Reformed rhetoric turns so many people off, we don’t even get a ear.
- browse entries:
- older »
Connect
Weblog Archives
About Me
-
If I appear out of place, it is because this is not my home.
Subscriptions
Pulse
Photostrip
Recommended
-
weblog entry from ProvokingThought@xanga
-
weblog entry from revelife
-
weblog entry from
Tom -
weblog entry from revelife


Chatboard (0)