Friday, 25 January 2013
-
Life Lessons from a Waiter: Love Those with Special Needs
A waiter in Houston, Michael Garcia, has come to know many of his customers as though they are family. Thus, when he saw some unfamiliar customers making rude comments about 5-year-old Milo Castillo, a child born with Down's syndrome, Michael felt the need to speak up. Apparently, one of the customers said, "special needs children need to be special somewhere else." And Michael responded by saying, "I'm not going to be able to serve you, sir."According to reports, "The customer and his family left, but Milo's family had no idea of the incident until another server told them. Word of Garcia's "heroic" response got out after that, and before long his Facebook page was inundated with affirming comments—the media soon followed. The general sentiment is, "He stood up for Milo just because it was the right thing to do." This story highlights the fact that there is still a desire to affirm the value of human life, despite limitations. And, despite what secular professors teach about ethics today, our conscience is often the best guide with regard to respecting and valuing other people as human beings.
Unfortunately, there is currently a trend towards dehumanization with regard to the teaching of ethics in universities in the US. For example, the "Distinguished Professor" Peter Singer at Princeton University offers at least three criteria by which he decides whether or not a human should be considered a person. One criterion focuses on the question of whether there is any interest in the person's life. A second criterion regards any evidence of a strong desire to live. And a third issue focuses on whether or not a being is able to project desires into the distant future. If a human being does not meet these minimal criteria, then it does not necessarily qualify as a person, at least as far as Peter Singer is concerned.
The outpouring of public support for Michael Garcia and Milo Castillo suggests that many in the US public still by and large hold to the view than human life has great value, no matter what kind of limitations are experienced. Peter Singer promotes both infanticide and bestiality, and the views he holds are seen as quite cold and dehumanizing by people who believe that there is value in human life beyond mere utilitarian considerations. Sadly, we see society gradually becoming colder, as the Bible predicted it would be:
"Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold."[Mat. 24.12 NIV]
This news story was first noted at BCN and the original report is linked here. Read original news post here.
Do you know someone with special needs? What does it mean to those with disabilities to be empowered, respected and loved? What can we do to show love to those with special needs?
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)


Recommend



Comments (4)
I'm assuming that this Peter Singer person made that comment in reference to an unborn fetus as part of a pro-choice argument (correct me if I'm wrong), so I'm not entirely sure that it makes sense to apply it to a person who has already been born who has special needs. I guess I'm just a little confused by what you're trying to say here...
Either way, what an awesome waiter! Initially it doesn't seem like a lot to politely refuse service to someone, but I'm sure he did so knowing that he could have lost his job. I used to work with special needs children, and they were all such wonderful, vibrant, unique little individuals. It would break my heart to hear anyone say something like that about any of the children that I knew (or any special needs children).
@TheyCallHerEcho88@xanga - He did use that context. Peter Singer is an antinatalist, and Singer's philosophies and arguments are largely what David Benatar bases his antinatalist arguments on in Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. In that way, the OP is taking Singer's words out-of-context.
So very important were his actions & Godly...
Just imagine if it were one of our children...!
Christ will indeed reward you in glory my friend.
@TheyCallHerEcho88@xanga - @secretbeerreporter@xanga
The main idea of this connection was to outline how secular humanist views on human life are helping to make for a more dehumanizing view of ethics that would tend to play out in dehumanizing words and actions in society. I should have probably elaborated more on this theme in the conclusion:
"The outpouring of public support for Michael Garcia and Milo Castillo
suggests that many in the US public still by and large hold to the view
than human life has great value, no matter what kind of limitations are
experienced. Peter Singer promotes both infanticide and bestiality, and
the views he holds are seen as quite cold and dehumanizing by people who
believe that there is value in human life beyond mere utilitarian
considerations."