Thursday, 26 April 2012
-
How Do We Love Homosexuals? Responding to "I'm Christian, Unless You're Gay"
By Conrad MaSo in case the article hasn't reached your Facebook page yet from a friend of a friend of a friend, here it is: I’m Christian, unless you’re gay.
I read this article and one teen's response to the article tonight, and it got me thinking about what exactly is my stance on homosexuality. Obviously, I have to stick by God and say that homosexuality is most definitely a sin. Everyone in Church already knows that, and we don't have to beat it death. So the tricky part with this issue is how exactly do we deal with homosexuals outside of church? Or is that not even the best way to question it? What we should be asking is what is the best way to love homosexuals?
Some people take a hard line conservative approach that we should absolutely not legalize gay marriage in Canada. Yet in Canada, some people may take that position not really knowing what the consequences are and what it really means to this particular group of people. I'm thinking that there needs to be some sort of relational connection before we just make such a conservative stance especially when people in Church tend not to know anyone who happens to be gay.
At one point I did take a zealous conservative approach like that until God taught me more about love and what it really means. Love still means being a friend to those who are lonely and reflecting Christ as best as we can with the help of the Holy Spirit. And pardon my harsh language but there is a part of me that is deeply hurt when the Church makes unloving actions like bullying on a homosexual who has just come out of the closet.
Being Christ, does not mean beating a homosexual senseless until they commit suicide! Actually, that is rather tame. I could easily insert any number of swear words into those bolded letters. But I won't because that would devalue my opinion and also make me not think very straight.
Homosexuality may be a sin, but bullying and being overly judgmental is a sin as well. The Church knows this and we should strive to do better, and I write this post as a loving brother in the hopes that we can.
In addition, there is also another deeper issue. What is the sense of telling homosexuals to not act on their desires when a good number of them don't even know who Jesus is? Unless they already know Jesus, it is downright offensive to say, "You're a sinner," to someone who doesn't believe in Jesus yet. So with this issue, I am almost inclined to take the side of "excuse the sin, till they know Jesus."
However, with an issue like homosexuality, there are so many other things to consider that I'm not entirely certain if that is the best way to love homosexuals. I've never been close friends with one. However, what I do know is that I will try my best to be friends with that person as normal as I treat any other friend. The author of that article that went viral did touch on at least one thing well which is:
37 And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. 38 This is the great and first commandment. 39 And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
Matthew 22:37-39Furthermore, there's another question. I am also reminded of a Kirk Cameron interview I saw a few weeks back, and I was thinking that so many people missed a few key points. Yes, we are Christians. Yes we believe that homosexuality is a sin. The thing is, if the world decides to challenge a Christian on the topic of if their child ends up being gay, then the Christian is caught in a trap.
There's a trap in two ways. First, if the parent totally tolerates the child's homosexuality, then there is part where the parent faces a dilemma of whether he or she is sticking by their beliefs or not. It practically makes the parent look like a hypocrite. On the other end of the spectrum, if the parent outright shuns the child, that's just not being a responsible parent.
However, like I outlined in this post, there is a mediating factor. We have to ask the question of whether the child knows Jesus or not. If my child does not know Jesus and he or she ends up being homosexual, then I have no other choice but to take the path of tolerance. Coming out of the closet takes a lot of courage to begin with, and I wouldn't want my child to end up committing suicide over the lack of love from others. If my child does know Jesus, then he or she would already know what God thinks and he or she believes the same thing I do. I would try to be as loving of a father I can be to help my child overcome the struggle, because in this case we both believe that being gay is a sin, and we are both in a deep relationship with Jesus.
I think a lot of this debate stems from Christian parents fearing deeply for their kids that they won't ever get to know to Jesus. It is a scary fact for any Christian parent to think about from what I sense. At the same time, we can't reflect Christ by completely forcing Jesus on our kids. And it is an even scarier fear if a Christian parent ends up with a homosexual child. We have to lovingly teach our kids and pray for our kids. But in the end, the strongest faith comes from those who own their own faith -- not those children who've been overly forced.
Heavenly Father, I pray for those who will be reading my blog and I pray not only for my readers but for me as well to be able to surrender control to you God on my life and where it is headed and what type of children I'll be taking care of in the future. I pray this humbly in Jesus name. Amen
If you've read the article, "I'm Christian, unless you're gay," how do you respond? How can the church lovingly respond to homosexuals -- Christian or otherwise? Is it the responsibility of the church to hold accountable all homosexuals or just those who are Christians?
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)


Recommend



Comments (54)
As far I have been informed, it's not being homosexual that is a sin but engaging in homosexual acts. If you find out your son or daughter is gay, but know they still are Christian, then encourage them to live a life of celibacy. No one can help being attracted to the same sex if that is who they are (and trying to put them through straight therapy is ridiculous), but if they believe acting on it is a sin, then can just not act on it. That's really the only solution I've come up for the dilemma. You are loving and accepting them, but directing them toward a choice that will keep them from sin.
I'm not Christian, though. So my opinion is a sort of "looking in from the outside" viewpoint.
Jesus never spoke one word about gays and lesbians. His erstwhile follower Paul said a word or two, but not much more. For the most part it wasn't a burning issue at the time or place. Now flash forward 2000 years to America and it has become the sin du jour for Christians.
I think it is a case of the majority finding a Biblical excuse to beat up on a minority. I wonder how many Bible believing Christians think it is a sin to enjoy a bowl of clam chowder on a cool day? Not many I venture because they have willfully decided to avoid God's prohibition on eating shell fish, but they sure as heck are not going to tolerate gays because the Bible teaches them to do so.
How many Christians have followed Jesus' teachings on getting re married after a divorce? Not many judging by pew polls. But all those divorced and remarried Christians who beat up on gays and lesbians are themselves guilty of living in adulteress relationship. But this sin of course since it involved the majority community is ignored or they already put their spin doctors to work to get around this inconvenient teaching.
How many Bible believing Christians have sold all their goods and wealth and gave it to the poor like Jesus taught in the Bible? Again not many. How many have found ways around this teaching? Legions.
What pissed Jesus off more than anything else was hypocritical religious sin hunters and what do most people think when they hear the word Christian? Someone who hates gays and lesbians, someone who thinks they have the right to tell people who and how to love, someone who is busy, busy hunting down sin in his neighbor.
@PrisonerxOfxLove@xanga - "Nevertheless, in Leviticus, God states specific prohibitions against certain sexual unions: various kinds of incest, sex with animals and homosexuality."
God also states prohibitions against cloths of mixed fibre and eating shellfish, but these tend to not make the pick-and-choose criteria of the Christians who use leviticus as anti-homosexual fodder.
I don't know how people can read Leviticus and regard it as anything but bat-shit crazy.
@When_We_Were_Both_Cats@xanga - Christian and Jewish scholars gave meaning to their scriptures centuries and centuries and ago. And it took them centuries and centuries to do it.
So not only are you are trying to give meaning to something you know absolutely nothing about but you are assuming magisterial authority when you have absolutely none.
It's kind of like telling JK Rowlings that she doesn't know the meaning of all own Harry Potter books, only worst.