There will probably always be the tension of reading the Bible and understanding it as infallible or inspired.
To clear the air as to what that entails I'll put it out there:
Thinking the Bible is infallible means that there cannot
be any errors within the text, while the inspired perspective on the Bible means that God spoke to
the writers and by that method they
were the ones who put the Bible together.
Personally, I'm caught in this tension simply because of the different circles of followers of Christ I hang out with. Some have a conservative view on life and so from there their faith is developed. Others have a liberal worldview and so from there their faith has been cultivated.
Is it wrong to be conservative or liberal? No, if not practiced to the extreme. I believe it's good to be even keel in one's beliefs, whether in matters of faith or other matters, to have a balance in what one believes to be true.
I also believe that one should be able to live with a bit of doubt; too often I think followers of Christ -- myself included -- have only lived out our faith because we think we have all the answers and we're the ones who are right.
But I believe that, as a result of this, we've traded faith in for certainty, to which as Anne Lamott so aptly put it; "the opposite of faith isn't doubt, it's certainty." To which I would have to agree with her, but sometimes I think Christiandom only says, "We are right," in a cocksure matter-of-fact kinda way, when we should live in the tension of doubt and faith and say, "What if we're wrong?"
As Peter Rollins says quite often -- to which it's the theme of his book Insurrection
-- "To believe is human, to doubt divine." And while I won't get into it in this post, I believe Jesus too hung in this tension for a while when he lived some 2000 years ago.
I believe that, whether you fall on the side of the fence that says the Bible is infallible or whether you fall on the side of the fence that says the Bible is inspired, the Bible needs to be read in context. By context I mean not the verse alone, not even the verses surrounding that verse alone, not even that chapter alone. All of the Bible needs to be read as to give the fullest broadest perspective, to read in a co-mingling of faith and doubt and trust and tension.
But one thing to keep in mind is that who we are and what we have gone through as well as what we're going through affects how we read and keep in the Bible as well as what we keep out of the Bible as well. As NakedPastor
put it in one of my favorite comics; "The Bible + My Interpretation = My Interpretation"To Christians, how do you read into the Bible? To people of other faith systems, do you live in the tension of your texts? Whether they be infallible or inspired or other?