Saturday, 26 November 2011

  • Be Fruitful and Don't Multiply

    As I listened to a sermon discussing the biblical purposes for marriage  took notes on Twitter. My friend responded by asking about an absent purpose which was "to be fruitful and multiply." He was asking if bearing children was a universal command for all Christians who marry. I said no and my explanation turned into the following examination of that command.  

    There are many wonderful Christians who believe that the command to "be fruitful and multiply" is a command for all believers, or all married believers, or all married believers who are able to bear their own children. It's easy to see how this can get tricky right off the bat. I believe that this is a command for all Christians as well but not in the way these siblings do (and we'll get back to how I see things playing out for child-bearing at the end). In fact, I think their interpretation and application of this command demands that they miss a key element of the context of the command in scripture.

    While the words "be fruitful and multiply" show up several times in scripture it is not always as a command. Often times the phrase is a promise from God or a blessing from a person towards a specific recipient. Some great examples of this are Genesis 17:20, 28:3, 48:4, Leviticus 26:9, Jeremiah 23:3, and Ezekiel 36:11. The words "be fruitful and multiply" show up as a command in three different situations in scripture. Let's take a quick look at these individual cases and then we can draw a conclusion from their similarities on how we are to understand this command and it's application for believers today.

    Passage 1

    • So God created the great sea creatures and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth." And there was evening and there was morning, the fifth day . . .

      So God created man in his own image,
         in the image of God he created him;
         male and female he created them.

      And God blessed them. And God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth" (Genesis 1:21-23, 27-28).

    This passage is a piece of the Creation story. God creates the creatures of earth and tells them to fill the earth. God then creates mankind and commands them to be fruitful and multiply as well. In doing this mankind shall have dominion over all the other creatures. This passage has the notion that mankind will be where creatures will be. The planet is meant to house the creatures and mankind, so use the rooms of the house. That's the point of the command in this passage; to continue the beginning of creations by producing goodness and reproducing what God has produced so that the earth may be filled. 

    Passage 2

    • Then God said to Noah, "Go out from the ark, you and your wife, and your sons and your sons’ wives with you. Bring out with you every living thing that is with you of all flesh—birds and animals and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth—that they may swarm on the earth, and be fruitful and multiply on the earth" . . .

      And God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. The fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth and upon every bird of the heavens, upon everything that creeps on the ground and all the fish of the sea. Into your hand they are delivered . . .

      And you, be fruitful and multiply, teem on the earth and multiply in it" (Genesis 8:15-17, 9:1-2, 7).

    Though some verses have been omitted to highlight the specifics being discussed it is clear to see the striking similarities between the commands of God towards the creatures and humans in Creation and the commands for Noah in the Flood. Both passages first consist of a command for the creatures to be fruitful and fill the planet and then consist of God commanding the humans to fill the planet. So far we've seen God create the world and command those in it to be fruitful (producing good things) and multiply (fill the earth). Then God saw the wickedness of the inhabitants, sent the Flood, kept a remnant, and commanded the remnant to do what the original creations did. This is almost a second creation. Both accounts consist of an empty world needing to be filled with the good God has created which can reproduce themselves. The world is empty and thus should be filled. The world must be used, occupied.

    Passage 3

    • God appeared to Jacob again, when he came from Paddan-aram, and blessed him. And God said to him, "Your name is Jacob; no longer shall your name be called Jacob, but Israel shall be your name." So he called his name Israel. And God said to him, "I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply. A nation and a company of nations shall come from you, and kings shall come from your own body. The land that I gave to Abraham and Isaac I will give to you, and I will give the land to your offspring after you" (Genesis 35:9).

    This passage is a bit different from the previous two in that the earth is no longer empty of inhabitants. However, the earth does seem to be empty of people whom God has found favor in. The righteous are few. In other words, while there has been multiplication there has not been much fruitfulness. God came to a fruitful/righteous man named Abraham and made a covenant with him and his descendants. Jacob is the second generation of these descendants and Jacob, though troubling for a time, has come to God, wrestled with him, and found a new identity in doing so. He is now Israel and this renaming is part of a greater blessing. The blessing is that the Abrahamic covenant lives on through him, under the name Israel (this shall be the name of God's people). At this point in the story God is still looking for mankind to fulfill the command to be fruitful and multiply and his catalyst is now the lineage of Abraham, because of Abraham's faith and fruit. Not surprisingly, God made Abraham and his wife bear children (multiply) after his covenant was made. This was quite the miracle since the couple was previously unable to bear children. It was imperative that this particular couple bear children now that the covenant had been made. 

    We see here that God is fulfilling his covenant through Jacob, now Israel, and fulfilling his desire for a world filled with his created beings that produce good fruit. Through Israel that fruit shall now come just as multiplication has now come. God informs Jacob that a nation, and a company of nations, and kings shall come from his line. This is why it is so important that Jacob be fruitful and multiply. Jacob will certainly multiply. God has clearly promised that. God is commanding that Jacob live into that and to be fruitful in doing so. In short, God is building his fruitful people so that the world which has seen multiplication may now also see fruitfullness! After all, the desire of God with Israel has always been to bless all people and bring them back to him through Israel (Genesis 18:18, 22:18, 26:4) and we see this being fulfilled in the New Testament (Romans 11).

    Conclusion

    In this article I have pointed to all the passages in which the phrase "be fruitful and multiply" appear. All of the passages exist within the Old Testament alone. Only three of them are actual commands from God. In all three scenarios it is easy to observe that God is starting something new. This command is not a common command. This is a special, unique, holy command. The command is given at three specific times and to three specific groups of people in order that three specific purposes may be fulfilled.The differences between the context in which these commands appear and the world in which we now live is that in the first two the world was empty of both good fruit and inhabitants whereas in the third the world was full of inhabitants but not fruitfulness and thus God promised inhabitants to come out of fruitful men and commanded that the coming inhabitants be fruitful as they multiply. God was starting creation, restarting creation, and restarting his people. After this endeavor the command never shows up again. We can conclude from this evaluation that the command to be fruitful and multiply is not directed at all people, all married people, or even all married people who have the ability to bear children. Thus, it is not wrong or disobedient to be married and to not bear children according to scripture.* However, there are the later passages in which God speaks his promise to make his people fruitful and to multiply. At the same time, that is God's doing and it is in the context of his workings with his unique people on the earth. 

    So where does this lead us in terms of childbearing? We've already concluded that this is not a command to all married people. We can also conclude that the earth needed to be filled when it was empty and since the world is no longer empty the command no longer applies to us today. Must the earth remain filled? Yes. It is good to have children. However, from the third passage we see that the inhabiting the world is not the most important part of the command. Fruitfulness must exist as well. It's interesting that the command is not to multiply and be fruitful but instead to first be fruitful and then to multiply. This is exactly why God takes the route he does with Israel. Fruitfulness was lacking. As a result God went to where fruit existed and commanded the fruitful ones to multiply and they obeyed. This raises the question "If Christians are fruitful and this world is still filled with unfruitful inhabitants then is not the command to Jacob still the command to the Church?" It's a fantastic question but I don't think we can simply answer "yes" to it.

    While the Church is still Israel she is different from the Israel of the Old Testament. Christ has come and he brought the kingdom of God with him, for he paradoxically is also the kingdom of God. Christ is the definitive answer to the rebellion and lack of fruit in the world. Israel was to bless the world but could never do it fully so Christ came to save everyone and to directly call all back to the God not only of Israel but all Creation, all of mankind which is in his image. Was Christ a quick fix for current unfruitfulness? No. He promised to return, judging all creation according to the fruit it has produced, and to renew the earth. In that renewed time God will be our all in all. There will only be fruitfulness in that time for all the fruitless inhabitants will be cast out for they proved that they were not God's people but not obeying him in being fruitful as they multiplied. Not only that but they multiplied without being fruitful and thus expanded the unfruitful creation. They rebelled and they grew the rebellion against God. Until that time comes Christ has established on this earth his body in the form of the Church, which is led by his Spirit whom he has sent to us. God is working out his promise to make his people fruitful (through Christ and the Spirit) and to multiply them (through bringing people to him). Where multiplication once meant mere childbirth it now means second birth into the family of God (John 3:1-15, Acts 2:47, 5:14). Conversion and salvation are the multiplication of God's people. Unfruitful creations becoming fruitful is multiplication. This means it is now possible for God's people, Israel, the Church to be fruitful and multiply without physical childbearing, though it is by no means outlawed or frowned upon. Multiplication through childbirth is still good and still a blessing. If called to childbearing, a couple is obedient to obey and thus worships well. However, we can now say confidently that adoption of children is a way to multiplication since it would consist of fruitful people multiplying fruitful people.

    The spreading of the gospel into the hearts of people is now the form of multiplication God seeks. As Christians and nonChristians produce it is the duty of the Christian to continue loving and bringing all people to God, reconciling them (2 Corinthians 5:11-21). In this, God adds to our numbers, multiplying us, multiplying his people, multiplying his fruitful people and thus fulfilling his own command which we were never truly able to fulfill ourselves. It is through the Triune God that this work is fulfilled. So bear children (a lot of people need to), adopt children (a lot of people need to), be without children, or be single (if you can accept that calling). Whether you reproduce or not, be fruitful. Make disciples of Jesus Christ, reconciling men to God, raising the youth to know Him, and in that way know that you are being fruitful and multiplying. Peace be upon you.

    What do you think? Have I misunderstood the context or how this command exists in scripture? Is my interpretation of how the current church is to be fruitful and multiply unsupported or a stretch? 

    *Some might argue based on the passages in 1 Timothy 3 and Ephesians 6 that because there is a command from Paul to treat children well it is assumed that all the Christian couples have children. It is also argued by some that since the list of credentials demanded for church leaders includes how one manages their children that only christians who have children are worthy of leadership and thus all should strive to be such leaders. Both of these assumptions are not safe to make. In the same letter (even chapter) that Paul instructs fathers how to treat their children he instructs slave owners how to treat slaves. Where there are commands for husbands ad wives in general there is never any command which implies they are to be procreating. When the single people in scripture are spoken of it's never said of them that they ought to get married so that they may have children. Children are great blessings but not great commands. This doesn't mean we should assume all Christians ought to have slaves or even employees. As for the lists of proving a good church leader, the list is about fruitfulness or character. The test is not what the person has done (multiplied) but who they are and how it is seen in their lives (fruitfulness). Besides, we know for a fact that those tests also speak only of married men and there were unmarried and childless men and women who were leaders in the Church (Paul included). 

Comments (60)

  • StatelessPilot

    @MsButterworth311@xanga - I highly doubt that NFP is really that effective. In fact, I don't believe it for a second. I have seen no third-party studies confirming this, and it seems the only group that actually touts this number is the Catholic Church. I bet in practice it has a disgustingly high failure rate. 


    Even so, vasectomy is still much more effective at 99.9%, and I'm still glad I had mine. Christian or not, I have no desire to ever have kids, and I'm not doing it. Period, end of story. 
  • mccanarie@xanga

    I think the bible is pretty clear on what it says. When we start throwing in our 2 cents, even if we spend a lot of time coming up with what we think it means, we muddy the waters that are crystal clear on their own.

  • Coffee_and_Chem@xanga

    @Resurrectionem@xanga - Why should anyone need an excuse for that? 

  • Coffee_and_Chem@xanga

    @mccanarie@xanga - But it's not crystal clear. Thus why there are so many denominations based off of the same scripture. Are people not supposed to think about a passage they read? People need to read and reflect on their own to develop their own personal relationship with God if they choose. And if multiple people read the same thing, there is a rarely 100% agreement on the meaning and interpretation. 

  • TheFifthHero@xanga

    I agree.  God was telling those people in the Old Testament to multiply: Adam and Eve, Noah, and Jacob because the world was young and empty.  It's natural for God to want them to multiply.  

    Today, we are already facing overpopulation.  Bringing a child into the world when you can't care for it is nothing short of irresponsible.  Popping out child after child (I'm looking at you, Duggars) is also irresponsible.  

    God in no way commands us to bear children.  He also does not forbid birth control.  People take one phrase out of context and build a whole theology around it.  

  • Rose_Hikari@xanga

    @MsButterworth311@xanga - "Besides, the divorce rate of couples who use
    NFP is 5%.... the divorce rate of everyone else (including Catholics who
    don't use NFP) is almost 50%. So the couples following what I believe
    is God's plan for sex are doing something right!"

    Just wondering... where are the facts supporting this? Are you really saying that contraception methods affect divorce rate? "Correlation does not equal causation" is immediately what comes to mind here.

  • BehindTheSeens@xanga

    Ok... some married couples physically can't have kids... that doesn't make them unGodly or anything, so obviously, it's not a huge deal.  But I don't think that means it's ok to prevent yourself from having kids.  If God wants you to have kids, let Him give you kids.  Don't try to prevent it because of this post.

  • StatelessPilot

    @BehindTheSeens@xanga - Except for there are legitimate reasons to choose not to have kids, religion aside. My reasons for choosing not to have kids include financial (it costs almost a quarter of a million dollars to raise a kid, money I can think of a lot better things to spend on), career (I'm on the road a lot for my job, making it almost impossible to raise a family), genetic health (I'm a carrier of two genetic disorders which I don't want to pass on), personal freedom (I would rather be able to go out and not worry about childcare), among other thingsl 



    For those reasons, I still regard my vasectomy as one of the best decisions I've ever made. 
  • mccanarie@xanga

    @Coffee_and_Chem@xanga - I think the reason why there are so many different denominations is because there has been an abuse of scripture by one particular denomination or another at certain points in history and rather than expose and change the practice of the church, people decide to leave and start a "new work" and instead of simply preaching the gospel, they set out to make it clear how different they are from the group they just left. Most differences between modern denominations can be traced back to specific events that are no longer culturally relevant.


    The bible is as clear as it needs to be. It will always be relevant to the culture that is reading it. How certain commands are to be carried out may differ, but the gist is always the same.

  • TheGreatBout@xanga

    For the record (and those who didn't notice), this post was not discussing contraceptives. That's a great topic but it's not one present in the article itself. It'd be cool if someone wrote on it though.

  • ltl_rvr@xanga

    The be fruitful and multiply phrase is in my mind the same idea as "Go and make disciples" in this regard:


    God gave us brains- if we can see the world is overpopulated and the majority of it doesn't have enough to eat, let's TAKE CARE OF THOSE ORPHANS AND WIDOWS and disciple them! 


    Jesus speaks of Christ followers as the branches in Him that should bear good FRUIT.  Maybe it's just me but I see a huge correlation between the be fruitful and multiply of the OT and the discipleship theme of the NT.

  • lightnindan@xanga

    In reference to some of the previous comments, I can't find scripture that commands us to have sex only for the purpose of reproduction. Ever read the Song of Solomon?  Be fruitful and multiply means what it says, but it doesn't say everything that people have read into it.   I choose to try not (anymore) to have children, but still enjoy a phenomenal physical relationship with my wife.   There are specific instructions to avoid legalism and instruction that the law is made for man, not man for the law.  God gave us specific instruction about some things and was silent on others.  He also gave us common sense and a conscience to guide us in the areas where He gave no specific instruction, then He, through Paul, did give instruction on how to handle our consciences.  I choose not to bet the health of my wife against the odds of complications similar to those she had during her last pregnancy and the birth of our sixth child, and I challenge anyone to find specific scriptural teaching that contradicts my decision.

  • BehindTheSeens@xanga

    @StatelessPilot@xanga - To be honest, I understand why you chose to have a vasectomy.  However, having one is kind of like trying your hardest to take control of your life in your own hands instead of having faith in God.  Got gave you the gift of fertility and I think it's pretty messed up to damage his gift to the point of trying to get rid of it altogether.  You could be missing out on something that could change your life around and give yourself more meaning.  But I guess you'll never know now.  =/  I'm sorry for you.

  • kevakouture@xanga

    We have the power to change nearly anything about ourselves as we see fit, we were given the option. God doesn't have a lot of say in it, especially when you're an atheist like a lot of us. One invention I like? Birth control. It is amazing. I have no period, no children, everyone is happy all around.

  • kevakouture@xanga

    LOL! You think people are only going to have sex for children? Well, you have fun with that, Butterworth. I will enjoy the release of hormones and my natural stress release.

  • StatelessPilot

    @BehindTheSeens@xanga - Missing out on what? $250,000 of my hard-earned income per child? My free time? More time to devote to my career? Changing shit-filled diapers? Dealing with raging hormones and attitudes? Having to use my sick time for my kids instead of when I'm sick? Uh, no. There are absolutely no benefits to having children. 

    I'd rather keep my income, drive my expensive cars, own my own airplane, etc. than raise a child. At least they won't ever talk back to me or disobey me. 

    Someone who doesn't want to be a parent and ends up with a child will undoubtedly be a crappy parent. That's exactly what would happen to me. If anything, I just did the human race a favor by having a vasectomy for that reason. I'd be a lousy parent on account of the fact that I wouldn't want to be one. 

    I find more meaning in my life through other things: my career (my first love in life), my hobbies, and caring for animals (pets). I don't really even need to be married to have meaning in my life, and I don't really care one way or another if I get married. I feel like a complete human being as it is. Granted, I'm fully planning on ending my life when my career ends, because without it I have no reason to live (and I would do the same thing even if I had children), so it's whatever. 




    No need to feel sorry for me. I definitely don't. 
  • stuartandabby@xanga

    Taken in context, I don't feel the "be fruitful and multiply" commands are ever intended as binding on Christians. Marriage is a decision every Christian has to decide; the NT lists pros and cons of each. As far as having kids, again, that decision is up to a man and his wife.

    I can see the rationale behind a spiritualization of the command, but I shy away from seeing that as intended. Kids can be a blessing. God is big on people producing good fruit, i.e., actions. These are things we learn elsewhere from explicit teachings.

    Re: some of the comments, I'm often annoyed at the presumed maxims people throw out about why God gave us sex.

  • QuantumStorm@xanga

    I strongly suggest you take a look at 1 Cor. 7:1-10. It's a very enlightening passage.

  • QuantumStorm@xanga

    @BehindTheSeens@xanga - Having children doesn't necessarily give life more meaning. What gives life more meaning is a life spent trying to follow Christ's teachings, and that is something that can be performed, single or otherwise. 

  • BehindTheSeens@xanga

    @QuantumStorm@xanga - I'm not saying that you need to be single or married or whatever to follow Christ's teachings, or that having children is the only thing that will give your life meaning.  I never said that at all.  All I was saying is that if you are married, you shouldn't prevent yourself from having children because you don't believe the whole "Be fruitful and multiply."  Using contraceptives within a perfectly healthy married couple is having a lack of faith in God.  It's trying to put life in your own hands instead of His.  If the mother is unhealthy, or there's a financial burden, then there's something called "Natural Family Planning."  It prevents pregnancy by abstaining when the wife is fertile, but is still open to life if God decides to give you a surprise baby.  Corinthians touches on it a little.

  • BehindTheSeens@xanga

    I'm simply saying that whenever sex occurs, there should always be an openness to life.  God's Will be done.

  • QuantumStorm@xanga

    @BehindTheSeens@xanga - Ah, that makes more sense. I agree with your assessment. 

  • BehindTheSeens@xanga

    @StatelessPilot@xanga - if you don't want kids, then don't have sex.  It's guaranteed to give you no children everytime.



  • stuartandabby@xanga

    @BehindTheSeens@xanga - Do you look both ways before crossing the street, or do you have faith in God? I'm not trying to troll here. My point is that I think you're creating a false dichotomy.

    Also, looking at it from the other angle, do you take issue with a married couple intentionally trying to have kids? Or should they just do nothing out of the ordinary and leave life in God's hands?

  • BehindTheSeens@xanga

    @Stuartandabby@xanga - I have no issues with a married couple intentionally trying to have kids (the good old fashion way).  God can choose to give you one when you want, or He can choose to make you wait till He thinks is the best time for you to have a child. Many people have issues with the Duggars, but hey, if they were able to conceive 20 children by the Will of God, good for them!  But is that all of our calling? I highly doubt it.


    I don't understand what you're trying to get at with your crossing the street reference.  And how am I creating a dichotomy when all I'm saying is sex should be open to life?
  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

About the Author

Who recommended?