Friday, 11 November 2011
-
A Few Did-You-Knows About the Bible
The writings of scripture were not compiled until recently in history and so the practice of encountering scripture was communal? People gathered together, had one person read from a scroll -- be it large or small due to it being a "book" or letter -- and the rest of the community of believers would listen? The authors of scripture didn't anticipate individual reading of scripture but communal reading of scripture. Before that, all mankind had was oral tradition so many of the stories were passed on from one generation to the next through memorization. That's a lot of repetition, which means a lot of communal gatherings to hear of God.
How does this change how you approach scripture?
Jesus was a Hebrew. Jesus was Jewish. Sometimes people call him a Christian, but the fact is clear from scripture that he was actually a devout Jewish man. He held to many Jewish practices, commented and taught about the Jewish Law while also observing Jewish holidays and feasts. While Jesus was showing the Jewish people how they were meant to live under the reign of God, he did not come to create a new sect per se, but to call everyone back into right standing with the Father. Also, a part of this little fact is that Christians were originally known as a Jewish sect and not a different religion. They met in the same synagogues as their Jewish siblings for quite some time.
How does this change the way you see Jesus, Jewish people and Christianity?
When it is written in 2 Timothy 3 that "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work" it is referring (primarily) to the Old Testament? The New Testament had not yet formally been put together and many believers were tempted to move away from the Old Testament and look solely to the testimony of Christ for guidance. This is why, in the verse previous, it is said that the reader and listeners of the letter have known the Holy Scriptures from infancy. Even now, after Christ, our old stories, poems, proverbs, and parables are of God and of great benefit to us who wish to be righteous!
How does this change your approach to the Old and/or New Testament?
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)


Recommend



Comments (5)
No.
The basic structure of the Catholic Mass, which is ancient, starts with a plea for mercy and forgiveness. Then goes into Bible readings (Old Testament, Psalms, New Testament). Then prayer to the Father, then the breaking of bread (Eucharist). Since I have been doing what you describe all my life, courtesy of the Catholic Church, it only seems natural.
When I was learning about christianity, hardly any of it made sense to me and I was raised in a christian church. When I'd ask questions I would be given vague answers or I was told that it was "just how we've always done it." That didn't sit well with me when I got older. I later started reading a blog by a woman who was a Messianic Jew and everything she said made sense to me. So I learned as much as I could about Judaism and the practices and traditions. Suddenly the NT started to make sense. AND showed me that I definitely didn't agree with traditions of christianity. (x-mess and easter, just to start with) So now I'm a Messianic Jew, one who follows the practices of the OT and the teachings of the NT. (no, I don't blindly follow the Jewish traditions, they have to be rooted in scripture first) It's a beautiful, meaningful "religion". The OT foreshadows the NT, the NT fulfills it. It's difficult for me to imagine having one without the other.
@homealivein45@xanga - same here.
The writings in scripture were not formally compiled until the early Catholic council of Rome in 382 AD, and even then, there are still some variations in the canon depending on which liturgical rite you use. For example, some of the Eastern Catholic churches lack the book of Revelations, and some also have 3 and 4 Maccabees.
But then, the Bible was meant to aid in the TRUE source of the faith - the sacrifice of the Mass. In other words, it was compiled as a liturgical aid, not so much as a user's manual for Christianity in the way some of the Protestant churches make it out to be.
A lot of folks mistakenly think 2 Timothy 3 is talking about the Bible itself as a whole... never mind that at the time 2 Timothy 3 was written, the Bible as we knew it didn't exist.