Thursday, 07 October 2010
-
Love for Sinners: We're Doing it Wrong
I am, frankly, tired of seeing Christians who excuse their hate, bitterness, and resentment towards those who are considered to be ungodly. All over the Gospel of Christ, we see how Jesus handled sinners. One overarching theme that we see in scripture is God's heart towards the lost. This can't be seen more clearly than in the gospels.The word "gospel" itself actually means "Good News". And what exactly is that good news?
Well, in Luke 4 we see that Jesus quoted the prophet Isaiah, saying"The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to preach good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind,
to release the oppressed,
to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor."Directly after preaching this, Jesus admits that this is a prophecy about himself. So we see that Christ came to set free those who are poor, imprisoned, blind, and oppressed.
Then in Matthew 9, we read about a pharisee who asked one of Jesus' disciples why Jesus eats with the sinners and the tax collectors.
Jesus heard this and replied, "It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. But go and learn what this means: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' (quoting Hosea 6:6) For I have not come to call the righteous, but the sinners."So now, we can add to the list that Jesus also came to heal the sick and minister to the sinners.
And of course, must also add to the list two other things: He came as a representation of what God intended for mankind (meaning it is our duty as Christians to attempt to live life in a way that he teaches), and he came as a sacrifice for our sin. That is most important because humankind can not live in righteousness apart from God.
Throughout the entirety of scripture, we see a theme that God is displeased with humankind's attempt at righteousness. And shouldn't he be displeased? After all, true righteousness can't come from ourselves, but from the One who is truly righteous and good. This is why Jesus was so quick to chastise those who pointed out the speck in another's eye. It's because false righteousness is a giant tree trunk in the way. We can't possibly see the speck in another person's eye.
In Luke 7:36-50, we read a story of Jesus eating at a pharisee's house. The pharisee's name was Simon (not to be confused with Simon Peter).
While Jesus was eating with Simon, a woman came into the house. The scripture tells us that this woman was a sinful woman... she was probably a prostitute. We don't really know, but what we do know is that she had lived a sinful life, but she came into this house, in search of Jesus.Back then, it wasn't good for a woman to travel alone, without the companionship of her husband or her father. This just wasn't done. It was considered to be trashy. It would especially be looked down on if a woman were to come alone to a dinner, uninvited. But this is exactly what we read in this story. To make things worse, the woman was already known for being a woman of ill repute.
When the woman came to Jesus in Simon's house, she came behind Jesus. Filled with sorrow, and feeling unclean, she wept. She cried enough tears that she began to cleans Jesus' feat with them, drying them off with her hair, which she had let down. Also in that time, a woman letting her hair down in front of any man except for her husband was also looked down on. It could almost be the equivalent of a woman removing her shirt in public today. But she got down on her knees, weeping, cleansing Jesus' feet with her tears and drying his feet with her hair. She wasn't ceasing to kiss his feet, as she poured perfume on them.
Simon couldn't believe what he was seeing. He had heard that Jesus was a prophet, but here he is, letting this unclean woman touch him. Simon said to himself, "If this man were a prophet, surely he'd know what kind of woman is touching him! How can he let her do that?"
Jesus turned to Simon and said, "Simon, I've got something to tell you."
"Teach me" Simon replied.Jesus went on to tell a parable:
"Two men owed money to a certain moneylender. One owed him five hundred denarii, and the other fifty. Neither of them had the money to pay him back, so he canceled the debts of both. Now which of the debtors will love the moneylender more?"
Simon replied, "Well, I suppose the one who owed the most money."
"You've judged correctly" Jesus said. Then he turned to the woman while still talking to Simon:
"Simon, do you see this woman? I came to your house and you did not give me any water for my feat. But this woman who came to me wet my feet with her tears and dried them with her hair. You did not great me with a kiss, but since she came in, she has not stopped kissing my feet. You did not put oil on my head, but she has put perfume on my feet. This is why I must let you know that all of her many sins have been forgiven, for she loved much. But to those whom have been forgiven little will love little."
Jesus then told the woman, "Your sins are forgiven. Your faith has saved you. Go in peace."
Here we have Jesus blessing a sinner, while he is chastising someone who is religious. And why is that? It's because she was weak enough to realize that she needed Jesus, while Simon was too stubborn to see the error of his self-righteousness.
When was the last time you were so moved by Christ that you've examined your own life and broke into tears knowing how sinful you are and how perfect He is?
It's easy for Christians to slip in the mode of self-righteousness... and I'm as guilty as any. But when we come to realize who it was that Christ came for, we develop a better understanding of who He is and how we are to live. Can we learn to love those who are trapped in sin? Can we learn that in our sin, we are equal, just as we are in our salvation? Can we learn to bless those who need blessing the most?
Of course we can. Jesus has shown us that this is possible.What examples in your life do you have of Christians failing to show the ungodly love? What examples in your life do you have of Christians who were truly showing love to the ungodly? What are we doing wrong that we are failing at showing love to sinners?
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)


Recommend



Comments (26)
I very much appreciate this post. I have a great respect for those who know that being a follower of Christ does not mean acting as if they have the right to judge. Only God judges, and he is just because only he knows the motive behind the action.
on the other hand though, some christians are afraid to take a firm stand and relay their beliefs without attacking
i'm probably far too pragmatic, but i really don't believe that loving everyone and thinking a lot of people deserve to go to Hell are very compatible.
There are wonderful examples out there.... but to find them you have to get up and go become part of the solution.
The problem is our continue use of the word sinner as a form of 'othering'. I use to like the phrase hate the sin love the sinner, but the more I think about it implies some form of 'othering' in which we are calling someone else (who is not us) a sinner. The truth of the matter is that we are all sinners, and we should just love each other as Christ loved us. The Bible does tell us to call out our brothers who sin, but I beleive this is a form of accountablity. We are to be open to our Christians brothers and sisters about our true selves so that they can help us live a life Christ would want us. We as Christians have no right judging those outside the church. They are not bound by the same principles. Instead, we should love them, pray for them, and hope one day Christ reveals Himself to them.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - One of the beautiful things about Christianity is that it isn't that we believe "a lot of people" deserve hell. It's that we believe everyone deserves hell. We should, anyway. Yet, we have a savior who died to take our place so we have a way to heaven simply by grace through faith.
@RDTR13 - I don't really believe that it's "othering". I think it is just as "othering" if we would call them non-believers. We can't always get rid of labels, but we can get rid of our "us vs. them" mentality. All of humankind are sinners... however, I think that it's a mistake for Christians to identify with that term because God is making us something new. Not that we still don't sin, but we've put our faith in Christ, who died because we were sinners. Now we are justified and made pure through his blood.
@jmallory@xanga - not sure how the implications of that are beautiful. bottom line is, according to your beliefs i'm going to burn for eternity because i don't believe in God. if you think it's a fair judgment, i don't think you "love" me in the slightest. maybe in some nice abstract hippie way, but not genuine love.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - But by your logic it would also be impossible to love someone you knew was dying from cancer because they were turning down treatment (whether they didn't think they had cancer, or didn't think that the treatment was worth the side effects, or that it wouldn't work or whatever their reasons). You have no control over the consequences of cancer, but that doesn't mean you love them any less.
It's not like we're excited that people are going to hell (well, some demented and perverse people are happy about it, but I'm not thoroughly convinced about their final destination either...), but a lot of Christians feel helpless because regardless of what we say or do, we can't make anyone believe us. We can't force "chemotherapy for sin" (oh god that sounds cheesey in the worst way) on anyone. I don't know about anyone else but I wish there was a back door into Heaven, I really do, because I hate not being able to save people. (I'm an emergency nurse, I'm hardwired to want to save people, it's really hard to be helpless.)
But the genuine love you speak of, it is a tricky thing, I agree. Humans as a whole are not very good at it. I know I'm not, but I do try.
I really enjoyed this article. My heart always flutters a little when I read this story, I love it. I love the way Jesus loves her and the way she loves Jesus, and the way He protects her from the scorn of others by simply being the one who accepts her. And I love how he puts Simon in his place like He's put me in my place so many times.
I do try hard to love other people. I'm not so good at conjuring up emotional feelings for people I don't know (or even people I do know), but I'm not sure that's what God is looking for anyway. I think it's more or less acts of love that He wants from us. After all, what kind of love is silent and immobile?
@theworldiswatchingyou@xanga - i'm not sure how you can compare a theoretical state of eternal damnation to something as scientifically provable as a state of cancer. and i didn't say you were excited, necessarily. but a huge part of my loss of faith was the realization that the people i love were being condemned to Hell, and i didn't think that was right. i could no longer, in good conscience, continue to worship a god who would do that. in essence, i chose my loved ones over God.
If I believe he'll is a legitimate concern for people, am I loving them if I purposefully ignored the danger just to avoid hurting the feelings of those who don't believe in it?
"When was the last time you were so moved by Christ that you've examined
your own life and broke into tears knowing how sinful you are and how
perfect He is?"
Moments ago as I read you post (and that scripture verse specifically)...very nice, thanks!
I prayed for years that He would tenderize my heart (only vaguely aware that my heart had become hardened)...and I'm grateful when I realize that He has answered my prayer. You've helped me see that!
One last thought...I've found that only by walking the journey and saying yes (confusedly) to what Jesus offers each day have I had even the merest glimpse of the power of Love. That Love is enough to transform my life, that Love is enough to offer invitation to another to see their life transformed, its enough for me to have faith that my merely offering love to another is enough (and that I can leave the rest to a living loving all powerful God).
Praise the living God!!
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - I wasn't arguing the existance of hell, I was explaining how love can continue to exist in a situation one believes will end badly. Therefore they are comparable given the parameters, which are merely "situations in which one person believes things will end badly and the other person doesn't."
I've never felt I had to choose between my loved ones and God because my choosing God or not choosing Him doesn't change anything for my loved ones, it only changes things for me.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - I'm trying to think what would allow you to believe that one must 'believe in God' or be punished by eternal damnation. You don't need to respond unless you'd care to...I'm not looking for a challenge, but just merely wondering.
@jmallory@xanga - point taken. but even if i think someone is making a huge mistake, i have no interest in telling others what to do. it's not my place... i'm not omnipotent... and everyone's life is different. and to me, saying that you firmly believe eternal damnation should be a concern for everyone is like me saying that since i absolutely believe animal prints are always a bad idea, i would best show my love by telling everyone i see wearing it that they look hideous. it seems like utter arrogance to treat everyone as though they think exactly like you.
@theworldiswatchingyou@xanga -matters of religion are not based on evidence, but faith. so, while you may see a loved one going to Hell as an inevitability, i see the simple fact that you believe it WILL happen as implicit support of it. if you can acknowledge that you have faith in, as opposed to knowledge of, God's judgment... then telling someone they're going to Hell has no more objective weight than telling someone they look ugly in whatever shirt they have on.
i know it won't affect my loved ones... but just as i'm sure God takes precedence over your loved ones, it is the opposite for me. the bottom line is: i don't believe the people i know who are non-Christian deserve to suffer for eternity for ANY reason. and i wouldn't feel that way if i did not love them.
@god_stories@xanga - well, last i checked the only way to be saved is to accept Jesus Christ. in order to accept or refuse anything, i have to believe in it first. while i'm sure there are a few people who believe in God but do not accept Him (misotheism), i'm pretty sure most people just opt for non-belief.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - I don't take my religion completely on faith. Parts of it, definitely, but I've seen enough evidence to convince me to put my faith in the parts I don't understand. You can know something without scientific evidence to back it up. I know there is a war going on the Middle East because I've seen news footage of it and have family overseas fighting it.....supposedly anyway. There's not any scientific evidence of it, but I know it nonetheless. I choose to believe it's happening, but that doesn't mean I support it.
I understand the premise that if you are okay with someone going to hell you obviously don't love them. But I am not okay with people going to hell...but you say that I still cannot love them, just because I believe it is going to happen if nothing changes. I don't understand that.
@theworldiswatchingyou@xanga - so then my question is, why would you adhere to a belief system that teaches that people are going to Hell? maybe i'm just able to be more objective about it... but i could never follow a religion i didn't 100% agree with and support. unlike you, i don't see it as an automatic given... like, the sky is blue so even if i don't like blue i have to accept it. when it comes to faith, people are born as blank slates. i cannot fathom being a Christian, while at the same time being unhappy with the main premise of the whole religion: eternal judgment.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - Regardless of what I like or don't like, understand or don't understand, it doesn't change anything. Either that's the way it is or it isn't. I mean, it has to be a given, one way or the other. It can't be true and false at the same time. I just believe that's the way it is. My believing it doesn't impact it at all.
Also, though, hell isn't the point of Christianity. If we take what Jesus said at face value, He's not looking for reasons or ways to keep us out of Heaven. Instead He did all the work so that we have the option of not going to hell. So the main premise of Christianity isn't that we start out headed for hell, but that there's a way out of that situation.
We're all sinners.
Interesting post.
outlet
factory outlet
outlet store
handbags
boots
handbags
bags
handbags
Shoes
supra shoes
gucci handbags
bags
bags outlet
bags
outlet online
shoes
shoes on sale
bags