Monday, 20 July 2009

  • High or Low Anthropology: Are You Good or Sinful?

    by Sean Norris of The Mockingbird Blog

    This week I wanted to join Derek Zoolander and ask the question, "Who am I?" By getting a little existential on you I hope to highlight one of, if not the, foundational building blocks for understanding the Christian Gospel which this blog continuously upholds. It is our anthropology.

    Classically defined Anthropology means "the study of human beings." It is the attempt to learn about and understand us. Often times on this blog we expand its use to reference one’s view of humanity, i.e. a high anthropology = people are good. However, we at Mockingbird hold that the Bible presents a disturbingly low anthropology in which humanity is completely sinful.

    "Well, that's very interesting, Sean. Thank you for that, but what's the point?" The importance of one's anthropology cannot be overstated. Our view of ourselves and others will inversely affect our view of Jesus Christ and His work for us. If we have too high a view of people, i.e. we think we are pretty good, and we just need a little bit of correction to get back on the straight and narrow path to improvement, then our view of Jesus and what He has done for us automatically sinks lower. If we did not need to be completely saved from death because of our complete sinfulness, then Jesus' death was overkill, literally. All he had to do was instruct us and correct us, and help us up whenever we fall so that we could continue onward and upward. The cross becomes unnecessary when our anthropology gets too high.

    The fact of the matter is we all start with a very high anthropology because we are sinful. We are born with pride that tells us, like Stuart Smalley, "I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me." This view continues on until we are confronted with the very real fact that we don't cut it in some way. Life has an uncanny ability to hold up that mirror that reveals that we are a bunch of posers.

    For every part of our life in which we may actually be excelling, there is a part in which we know we are failing. It reminds me of the movie The Devil Wears Prada when Anne Hathaway's character is lamenting to a friend that her relationship with her boyfriend is on the rocks and her

    personal life is in shambles. Her friend replies with something like, "Congratulations, you must be doing your job. Anytime things start to go well at work, your personal life implodes." The point is that we are failing, and the knowledge of that failure begins to crush us.

    However, no matter how bad things may get in our everyday, we are still pretty skilled at convincing ourselves that we can do better, that we'll turn it around somehow. For this reason we never quite expect the Bible's diagnosis of us. When confronted with the demand for perfection in the Bible (Matt. 5) we are simply decimated. Romans 3:12 leaves no wiggle room, "All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one." In the face of this anthropology we know without a shadow of a doubt that we need nothing short of salvation. The cross is no longer extreme or some form of divine child abuse. Rather, it is the Good News that Jesus has suffered for us, so that we might be free. He has taken our low place in death and has lifted us up to life.

Comments (8)

  • freeforming@xanga

    I don't have any particular comment I want to make about this post, except that it is excellently (is that even a word?) written.

  • golai@xanga

    Personally I believe if you have to pick one, a "bad" anthropology would be better.  Its largely situational though.

  • designandart@xanga

    We're bad, were sinfull. But, children, ready to start learning complex knowledge at three years old, are good learners. When I start thinking I'm pretty good, and feeling like it, it's time to check my ego. Pride goes before a fall. So I have to keep an eye on it. But that doesn't mean if I'm feeling a little pride then I'm going to fall. It just means I need to catch myself before I do fall, to recognize ego for what it is. Humility is recognizing pride and doing away with it before a fall.

  • too_pretty_to_die@xanga

    sorry, but i have yet to see overwhelming proof that all people are inherently evil creatures.  

  • Lynnjynh9315@xanga

    I think Christianity often succeed in completely "decimating" people by telling us two things:
    1.) God expects perfection.
    2.) We will always fall short.

    Then, of course, Jesus supposedly came to free us from the impossible demands of keeping the law, but most denominations firmly hold that a person's salvation depends on their ability to lead a Christian life. If we fail in that endeavor as well, Christianity offers nothing but hopelessness and despair.

    In many ways, I've given up on ever leading a Christian life- the Bible has become little more than salt to a wound in that it only reminds me of my own person shortcomings.

  • Theophilus166@xanga

    Anthropologists generally don't make moral judgments on cultures, so I think terms like "high anthropology" and "low anthropology" are confusing.   Anthropology doesn't really address the origin or nature of humans, it's more the study of how individuals and cultures behave and what they believe (which include beliefs about origin, but not judgments about the correctness of their beliefs).  I think whether or not humans have a sinful nature really is a theological question more than having anything to do with anthropology.

    Anthropology is about what IS, not what should be.  Anthropology answers the question "What do people believe about their nature?" While theology answers the question "What is the nature of humanity?"

    Statements such as "The cross becomes unnecessary when our anthropology gets too high." really don't make sense.  Your study of humans can't get too high or too low.  All it is is a study: to discover how people behave and what they believe.  I get the point of the post, and I know a few people have used those terms before, but I think this is a misuse of the word.

  • sarahzthoughts@xanga

    Yes, humans are inherently sinful, but that doesn't mean we don't all have the potential to be good. Obviously you don't have to be Christian to do "good deeds," though Christians know that the meaning of "good" according to humans can have any meaning a particular group or culture wants it to have, whereas God's definition never changes. Christians do "good" because the Holy Spirit enables them to do so, other people can be "good" as well, but not for the glory of God.

  • subSacred@xanga

    Nothing we do can be good unless Christ is in us. Without proper recognition of God, our "goodness" is cannot be for good motives. Preluding the ten commandments, and throughout them we are reminded that the commandments are tied to the fact that "I am the Lord your God." I believe that recognizing this is key to truly obeying His commands, and being "good".

  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.

About this Entry

Who recommended?