Friday, 19 June 2009
-
Frog Worship
"All religions are the same."
NOT!Here's a short article worth a minute of your time: Colour Changing Frog Worshiped in India.
Here's an even shorter clip from the article:Reji Kumar, 35, a lift worker, said the frog was white when he first spotted it but it soon changed to yellow and then grey by the time he got it home."By night the frog was dark yellow, and then it became transparent so you could see its internal organs," he said.
"It seemed like a miracle to me that this frog had so many different coats. So now people come to see him and pray to him."
The article doesn't really explain what the deal is about worshiping the frog, so I did a quick bit of Internet research and found a short paper on frog worship. Here's an excerpt:Interestingly enough, we find a panegyric of the frogs even in the Rig-Veda, [one of the four sacred Hindu texts] the oldest existing work in Sanskrit in which they are compared with the Brahman priests. Some of the stanzas of the hymn addressed to the frog reads: "As Brahmans, who a vow fulfill, The frogs had now a year been still. Like dried and shriveled skins they lay, faint, parched with heat for many a day expecting, long in vain, the showers withheld by Air's malignant powers. The frogs that bleat, and those that low, brown, green, on men all wealth bestow. The kind that on our pastures graze,we owe to them, with length of days." This hymn is a satire to the Brahmans but an encomium to the frogs. The Rig-Vedic people thought that frogs emitted their voice being roused by the showers of heaven. They even believed that frogs were the givers of hundreds of cows to them and they also lengthened their life in the rich autumn. - excerpt from "Frog Worship: A Unique Culture," by Nirish Nepal
Before we get too hasty, I will note that Judaism and Christianity have certainly had their fill of icon worship throughout history.
My main point here is that there are significant differences in the major religions of the world. But, maybe I'm just biased. In one commentary, a professing atheist made a comment that frog worship is no different than worshiping a cross.
How is worshiping with eyes on a cross different from worshiping a color-changing frog?
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)



True
Premium













Comments (121)
@lovechartreuse@xanga - Not sure. I'm still kinda hung up on the rude tone...it's making it difficult to translate your message. Ah well. Another day, maybe.
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - In other words you can't read.
Should have stayed in school. =]
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga -
"What Christianity does, among other
things, is to get people to realize that they ARE flawed, and that God
wants to teach us how to live better...but we cannot do it on our own
without His help."
well, the last part is the only part i really disagree with. i do not need a deity to tell me how to live my life in a way that benefits myself and others.
"If I'm even understanding what
you're saying, I'll simply say this: vastly different species - IE:
raccoon and girraffe - can't even mate. Their genetic codes are
completely different and will not lead to a new life. It's like trying
to mix wax with water and expecting a milkshake to result."
um... so? i don't see how evolution being true would allow different species to mate.
@lovechartreuse@xanga - I did actually, and graduated with my diploma. If you're going to try to insult me, at least do it in a way that makes sense. Obviously, I couldn't reply if I didn't learn how to read.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - So you disagree. Okay. What you're stating now is nothing more than an opinion. What we're looking for here is the truth.
Also, I never said that if evolution was true that it would allow entirely different species to mate.
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - No one gives a fuck about you. =]
*blocked.
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - Exactly. If the truth were to be known, it wouldn't be the truth. Or so they say...I don't know, I haven't given up everything to search for the truth...heh...
@lovechartreuse@xanga - LOL LOL LOL LOL No one you say? NO ONE? Wow. Ignorance IS bliss, isn't it? Somehow I get the feeling that you haven't heard all the people telling me how much they care about me.
And ya know, even if you don't get this reply (because you blocked me), that's fine. I can still rejoice in the fact I know you're wrong and you're just an angry little lady who doesn't like that she didn't get her way. (By the way, even my EX still cares about me. And she's married now. Sucks when YOU get made the fool, huh, by your own words.)
@Faerie_In_Combat_Boots@xanga - That made absolutely NO sense. "If the truth was known, it wouldn't be the truth." WHAT? So if I was blind, and didn't know the truth about what the color green looked like, would green stop being green? If I didnt know what 2+2 was, later learned it was four, would it suddenly become 5? Because if I suddenly learn the truth about something, then, according to what you said, it is no longer the truth. So it must become something else. But if that's the truth about truth, then upon learning that ABOUT truth, then it no longer is the truth, but instead something else. But to know that that is the truth - as you said - that truth about truth is no longer truth. You JUST created a circular, self-defeating logic that never made sense to begin with.
What I am gong to GUESS - I make no conclusions about what you actually think - is that you don't want to actually accept the fact that there ARE absolute truths in the world that NEVER change.
A basic truth is that which something is at that moment. One moment a wall is white - true. The next moment, after it is painted, it is blue - true. The truth about the color of the wall changed from moment to the next. But unless the color black was involved, it could never be said the wall was black - also true. Even in transition, the wall was, for a time, both blue AND white - true again. As stated, the truth about the color of the wall changed, but it was never something that it wasn't. Meaning that if I said that a white wall is blue, but I haven't even so much as touched blue paint to the wall, then that is not true.
An absolute truth NEVER changes. This often includes morality and various matters of science, and other things that escape my mind at the moment.
History, itself, cannot change. We can write ABOUT history and SAY that something different happened, but the truth is that what happened in the past DID happen and that cannot be changed. It is true that you and I were born. No matter who accepts or denies that, no matter what the medical records say, we both are here. Those events of our births happened. That will ALWAYS be true.
Even the concept of truth, itself, can never change. It's very definition is rooted IN itself. As I stated before, truth IS what IS. It does not change simply because we discover what IS true. Otherwise, you could never discover what was true before you knew it was the truth, and as a result, your own statement about truth is a self-contradiction.
(Forgive some of the redundant statements. Sometimes I have to "wind" myself up to get to my next point.)
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - It's not supposed to make sense...that's the point...If it made sense, then all of us would be Buddhas and masters and wouldn't be on the internet to begin with. We'd all be out trying to end suffering.
Here's what I base my 'logic' from.
We are constantly changing and evolving. The earth is constantly changing. Our lives are constantly changing. Everything is always changing.
Then what sense does it make for the truth to remain static? [to me anyway. a static truth makes no sense to me.]
What's past is past, nothing will change that, and that is the truth. But I'm talking about a higher truth here, something equivalent to god himself.
[even God, I've noticed, changes quite a bit from the OT to the NT.]
I've based a lot of my beliefs from the teachings of Osho...and this his take on truth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#Osho
By the way, have you ever read 1984 by George Orwell?
If Big Brother says that 2+2=5...then it's five, no matter what. Heheh...one of my favorite books.
@Faerie_In_Combat_Boots@xanga - "It's not supposed to make sense...that' the point..."
You have JUST defeated your entire argument with one sentence. Because, once again, you're stating that as truth, but you said that truth changes.
Also, God does NOTchange at all in the Bible. That is a common misunderstanding. So your logic, I'm sad to say, is based on a faulty foundation to begin with.
II + II = IIII Nope, still four.
And I read that link about Oshu...what he stated, is, again, his idea about truth...but then he goes on to say what he thinks is true, but he just say you can't KNOW truth by thinking about it. It's a self-defeating argument because to state what he just said, he had to be thinking about what he "knows" to be true. Truth does not simply disappear because you learn about it, nor does reality go away because you're watching it happen.
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - I have absolutely no idea how to argue this any more...heh...All I know is that it's not supposed to make sense while making sense, kinda like the concept of doublethink, so how about we agree to disagree, since my brain is fried? :]
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." -1984
@Faerie_In_Combat_Boots@xanga - Well, all I hear you trying to say is that somehow, 2+2=4 while also equalling 5. That is nothing short of a simple, logical contradiction. There's no other way around it.
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - >_< I was never trying to say that...I only made a statement derived from 1984 becuase of what you said of 2+2...
"If I didnt know what 2+2 was, later learned it was four, would it suddenly become 5?"
All I meant to say was if Big Brother said it was five, it would be five...it's a very symbolic statement to me. [symbolic of freedom, that is.]
@Faerie_In_Combat_Boots@xanga - But that's not freedom. That's confusion. To suggest that one thing can be equal to two other complete contradictory things makes absolutely no sense. To be honest, I'm not sure where you're getting your concepts from, but those sources really need help.
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - One question remains: Have you ever read 1984? If you haven't then that explains your confusion.
@Faerie_In_Combat_Boots@xanga - No, I haven't read it. But if that's where you're getting your logic from, that explains why none of it makes sense. As per the example of truth, 2+2=4 (and not 5), "Big Brother" does know what he/it is talking about.
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - Oh, no. I'm not basing my logic off the story...no way...I'd hate to live in such a dystopia in the in the first place, so why would I base my logic off it?
Big Brother (whether he exists or not; only the members of the Inner Party know) is the "dictator" of the 1984 world...In that world, there is no love, and the only duty is to the Party. It's a very good story, if you like that kind of stuff...
See, to really understand what I'm talking about, you'd have to read it. (though Wiki works just as well...heh.)
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - You totally don't get it, and that's okay. Not everybody can see past the cosmetics of a religion down to it's base. Stop making it about Jesus. EVERY religion teaches to not steal, to not hurt other people, to generally love others. EVERY religion generally teaches a positive message. The deep meaning of believing in something good, pure, etc, is to be a good, pure person yourself.
Therefore, every religion is a good one. There is no "one religion is better than another" as long as the message is positive. Because then it'd be more of what people see as a cult.
Personally, I think any belief system that teaches that it's absolutely, no-questions-asked better than another is more cultlike than religious. :)
@Aiyoku_Angel@xanga - I'd like to thank you for assuming I don't know what I'm talking about. You only prove the point that you haven't actually taken the time to truly examine the heart of Christianity. Oh, anyone can read about the rules and hear all the well-known stories of Christ, etc...but I'm not the one who totally doesn't get it.
For starters, read this, then tell me what other religion offers such a deal or has standards like this then offers such a gift. I'll save you the time of replying: NONE.
@NaitoOfNarnia@xanga - I read the entire link. The post is simply an attempt at preaching to the choir. I was raised Catholic, I went to Christian school for a number of years, and I've read all of the Holy Books that "good" Catholics read. You're over-complicating things.
There is nothing special--theologically speaking, the values are the same as any other, just the names of the gods are changed-- about Christianity, other than the fact that historically, they converted at the tip of a sword and it stuck out of habit, through the generations. Even in your own family, the first Christian in your family was most likely converted BY FORCE. Jesus didn't preach that. Neither was prejudice in his teaching. Jesus was HUMBLE. He, himself, never demonized other religions like the Old Testament did, or do Fundamentalist Christians.
If Jesus didn't do as such... why do his followers? Why must you be so rabid that you can't grace me with a real response, rather than simply insisting I'm wrong and changing the entire subject through preaching?
You, as a Christian, believe in your gods' divine presence in all things, do you not? So do Pagans, Wiccans, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, the list goes on. You, as a Christian, believe that everyone can feel your gods' presence and allow him to guide you. So do Pagans, Wiccans, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, the list goes on.
A number of religions promise
the same thing: salvation, unity with their god(s), forgiveness for not
being perfect in life--yet having a chance to perfect their spirit.
Every god, in every religion loves humanity. No worshiped god wants to
see the world destroyed by us because in EVERY religion, we are the
gods' children. You believe in an afterlife in which you are reunited with your diety. So does every other religion.
So, other than the fact that you, yourself, are a Christian... what in the world makes you think your religion is better, when it's fundamentally the same as every other? Why do you seemingly hate so much, when your god preaches about love and acceptance, other than the fact you think that Jesus died for your sins, and you'll be forgiven... so you can be as prejudiced as you want because your slate will be wiped clean? Because from all MY Christian learning, that's not a very Christian thing to do.
I have a reason to dislike most Christians: they are very unaccepting of any experiences that aren't their own. Many Pagans have no problem going to Christmas Mass with their family because they can see beyond proper nouns and feel the spirit of the servace: Peace on Earth, Goodwill towards Mankind, Love your fellow humans because Divinity loves you equally..... but would any Christian come see one of my Yuletide Prayer Circles? Not many. With so many people telling Christians "We'll have to agree to disagree on religion," why can't Christians accept other religions as valid ways of life as well? Why are ya'll so quick to say "Nope. You're wrong, wrong WRONG!" when those of other religions typically say "I personally believe something else; however, I won't try to convince you that you're wrong and I accept that it's your belief system."
And also, look at parts of the "13 Principles of Wicca" and tell me that it doesn't resonate with the things that Jesus taught. The Pagan principles are in bold. A comparison of Christian ideals are italic.
-- We recognize that our intelligence gives us a unique responsibility toward our environment.
(Okay, so this isn't specifically Jesus' teaching. It's a common sense thing. The environment provides us with food, clothing, even the materials for things such as televisions. It's still a good principle to live by. Why not protect it the best we can?)
-- We conceive of the Creative Power in the universe as manifesting through polarity and that this same Creative Power lies in all people.
(Kind of like the holy trinity does. The Christian god, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit support each other in helping Christians with life. Christians believe in all three aspects of the trinity and believe that the holy spirit is within them. Pagans believe that parts of their gods are in them, too.)
-- We recognize both outer worlds and inner, or psychological, worlds sometimes known as the Spiritual World. We neglect neither dimension for the other, seeing both as necessary for our fulfillment.
(Christians do the same thing! They try to balance the physical world with that of the spiritual by being good people so they can be more perfect for their god. They recognize the existence of Heaven--a world of pure spirit-- and strive for it, as do Pagans believe in an afterlife and strive for a positive experience within it. )
-- We honor those who teach, respect those who share their greater knowledge and wisdom, and acknowledge those who have courageously given of themselves in leadership.
(Like Christians do with Clergy! Pagans respect those who are more spiritually aware than they are, especially those who have given their lives to help better others in such an unselfish manner.)
-- Calling oneself "Witch" does not make a Witch - but neither does heredity itself, not the collecting of titles, degrees, and initiations. A Witch seeks to live wisely and well without harm to others and in harmony with Nature.
(Someone who calls himself "a Christian" but continually goes against the Ten Commandments is not a true Christian, because he doesn't really believe in the precepts of Christianity. Same with Paganism. Liars, cheaters, thieves are not truly Pagan, even if they claim to be. Neither religion preaches hurting people is an answer to anything.)
-- We believe in the affirmation and fulfillment of life in a continuation of evolution and development of consciousness giving meaning to the Universe we know and our personal role within it.
(Christians believe in the same thing. Through affirmation with their own god, they feel fulfilled and guided in life. They believe they know what is coming for them in the next life when they die, just as Pagans do)
-- Our only animosity towards Christianity, or towards any other religion or philosophy of life, is to the extent that its institutions have claimed to be "the only way", and have sought to deny freedom to others and to suppress other ways of religious practice and belief.
(This is more an American concept that a Christian one... but it's still COMMON SENSE. Just because I don't believe in Christianity, if they tried to outlaw it... I'd fight to allow others to worship as they please, simply because it's a right that EVERY person should have. If Paganism was to be outlawed, I'd expect people who weren't Christian to help me fight against it, because it's a founding principle of America: freedom of religion.)
-- We do not seek power through the sufferings of others, nor accept that personal benefit can be derived only by denial to another.
(Sounds like something straight out of the bible: Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. A true Christian does not hurt others simply to get ahead themselves. Neither do Pagans)
So many rules follow that of the basics of Christianity. Is it really that bad?