Saturday, 30 May 2009
-
Does the Bible Call for Male Supremacy?
There is an idea that has floated around for a long time that the Bible is in favor of female oppression and male supremacy. Many
times even Christians misunderstand the passages which talk about wives submitting to their husbands and husbands “ruling” their household. It is not uncommon to find “Christian” husbands who are dictators, not allowing their wife to have any say in what goes on in the house because for them to state opinions would be a lack of submission to him. This idea some Christian men have embraced, is wicked and against the Bible. The idea that the Bible is in favor of female oppression and male supremacy are both very much misunderstood. God created us all humans, male or female, and we are all to be treated as such.
Often in the Bible God compares the husband/wife relationship to God’s relationship with the church or believer. The Body of Christ is referred to as The Bride of Christ. Therefore how God treats us is how a husband should treat his wife.
God, in his relationship with us, is all about choice. To call God a dictator would be a borderline blasphemy. Since the beginning, with Adam and Eve, God placed the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the garden for one reason -- to give them a choice. They could follow what God had told them or they could choose to eat of the fruit of the tree. God doesn’t and never will force us to do anything, we must choose to love Him, choose to serve Him, and choose to follow what He wants us to do.
So although God set it up for the man to be in charge of the household, he never wanted the man to lord over his wife and force her to do all of his wishes. God is patient when we don’t follow His wishes; therefore a husband should be patient with his wife. God is interested in communication with us through prayer; therefore a husband should be interested in hearing what his wife has to say. God is a God of reason, he allows us to ask why and talk to Him about things and a husband should do the same. God is open to suggestion, He allows us to pray to Him and request anything we desire. Sometimes the answer is no or wait, but He is still open to hearing our suggestions, unlike some husbands who would think his wife suggesting something was a questioning of his authority.
It saddens me to see women who are forced to wear a burqa and walk behind their husband when in public, as a show of subjection to him. God, in his relationship to us, allows us to walk beside Him, talking as we go. God WANTS us to have the choice to do as we please, and only asks that we not use our freedom to commit sin.
God has made an exquisitely beautiful picture between a husband and wife, of His relationship with us, yet man has taken it and perverted and misunderstood it. God is not in favor of female oppression or male supremacy, but of choices.
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)



True
Premium












Comments (122)
Yeah... Male Supremacy was the act of the church.
Good post as usual, Simba.
GREAT post! And so very true!
@fugita@xanga - Actually, it's the act of humans, church-related or not. Because there are many in the church who DO follow the proper context of what God says on this matter. So to lump those together who do not live as God would want us to regarding marriage is an unfair generlization when others DO abide by God's wishes in marriage.
I've known many couples where they don't go to church at all yet the husband still misuses that particular Scripture. So really, it's not so much the church as it is imperfect humans, some of whom happen to be within the body of Christ (believers).
"So although God set it up for the man to be in charge of the household..."
you lost me. you're still spouting traditional sexism. you talk about choices, but it's pretty obvious you don't think that women should choose to lead a household.
i'm tired of the apologetic argument. as a woman, i am not secretly longing to have a man in charge. and i am not grateful for any man allowing me to walk beside him as though i were his equal. i AM his equal.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - no one is superior to anyone ever not in marriage or life.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga -
@fugita@xanga -
i completely agree!
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - Just because we are equals doesn't mean we shouldn't be grateful when we're treated as such. I'm grateful when cars follow the law and allow me to cross at a cross walk.
Why should I be grateful when they're just doing what they're supposed to? Because so many don't do what they're supposed to.
We should be grateful for all good things in life, regardless of how worthy we are of them.
Col 3:18 - Show ContextWives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.
Ok before you hit with the male supremacy things read the verse it says as unto the Lord!
Eph 5:25 - Show ContextHusbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;Later on in the Epes passage it says this Husbands love your wives as Christ loved the church, Jesus gave everything for the church he left the glory of heaven to come to this earth to be a servant! and that is what we have to be to our wives!
Eph 5:23 - Show ContextFor the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.Eph 5:28 - Show ContextSo ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
In the context of the verse above it says that Christ is the head of the church because he paid for it with his own blood! So in this essence it says the man is the head of the family a god given thing with the verse down below if someone is trying to act supremly and not in love towards his wife he is not loving his own body his own wife!
Jesus submits to the Father the Holy Spirit submits to Jesus and they all submit to one another, a trinity based on weakness!
everyone is equal to everyone...God would never discriminate, no matter what the Bible says.
sage
oh crap... this is bound to open up just a huge overflow of people who have irrelevant things to say concerning this...
the call of Scripture is NOT supremacy... the call is Male Headship for sure...
the same way Christ is HEAD of the Church which means that Christ leads the way...
but Christ leads in a way that gives, cares, protects, loves, cherishes, adores, and provides... which means that what happens to the Church is actually Christ's responsibility...
in the same way, husbands must lead in a way that gives, cares, protects, loves, cherishes, adores, and provides for his wife... and whatever happens to the family is the responsibility of the husband...
supremacy... not ever eluded in Scripture...
headship... it's all over the Bible about male headship... start in Genesis and you'll see Adam was made first, the woman was brought to the man, man named her as a symbol of authority (not authoritarian), but she was made from the man's side therefore there is equality in value, but a difference in roles... and thus because Adam was the man who was placed in the position of head... Adam was also held responsible for the sin of Eve and of himself as well... it was Adam who was called out by God, not Eve... there is no egality as far as roles are concerned as we see in the Fall...
and Christ's affection for the Church should be modeled in a marriage... the same way a husband is to have affection for one woman... it is the husband who leads, provides, protects, loves, and serves his wife... and the wife who nurtures, gives, submits, and serves her husband...
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - ok then... if something fails... you need to hold up your end of the deal and be responsible for whatever it is that fails when you make the choices you do... i take it if you were in the Garden... you would have wanted God to also place the responsibility on you as well right?
@leadworshipper82
I do not believe in male supremacy
@leadworshipper82 - Thank you. You have stated the difference between male leadership and male supremacy. In fact, that IS the difference.
Leadership is what made my husband ask me to marry him, buy a home for me, support me, (and now our baby) and be a wonderful rock of stability in my life.
Supremacy is what happens when men fail to be leaders. Passive supremacy is as scary to me (as a woman) as active supremacy.
When the man goes bad he gets kicked out of the house. When the woman goes bad, all hell breaks loose.
Therefore, woman must be chaste and strong at all times. As the woman goes, so goes Eden.
It has nothing to do with superiority or dominance. It is about roles. People seem to lose sight of the fact that men and women ARE different. Inherently. Physically, intellectually, and emotionally. We were designed to serve different roles.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - You're not alone.
"Ephesians 5:22-24 -- Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything."
Sure, people can get all fluffy and say that, "Ohhhh, we're all equals, we just have different roles!"
Yeah, okay. MAYBE you could say that about a few other verses that put men and women on equal ground ...
But there's no dodging the fact that the above verses are insinuating that women should submit to their husbands in some form or fashion, which is just another archaic example of sexism. Go ahead and say it's all benevolent, that it's simply about respecting one another. But the fact is, it's putting men above women. The quote doesn't remotely address how a man should submit to his wife.
Both husband and wife will have different roles depending on their personal strengths/abilities, but nobody should have to submit to anyone else.
@princess1505angel@xanga -
"Why should I be grateful when they're just doing what they're supposed to? Because so many don't do what they're supposed to."
i'll save my gratitude for men who go above and beyond, and i've met plenty of them (i'm dating one as well).
@leadworshipper82 -
"ok then... if something fails... you need to
hold up your end of the deal and be responsible for whatever it is that
fails when you make the choices you do... i take it if you were in the
Garden... you would have wanted God to also place the responsibility on
you as well right?"
i'll humor your question, even though i'm not Christian and do not believe Eden ever existed.
in this hypothetical situation, did Adam happen to grow a pair and realize that nobody forced him to take a bite, either?
of course it does. 99% of the important figures are male.
& god himself is not viewed as a female.
@scrambledmegzntoast@hardestlevel - Absolutly correct...if only society understood this too.
I see it as sexism everyone tries to justify by explaining it in sugar-coated terms.
@mini_mayfield@xanga - "but nobody should have to submit to anyone else."
Scripture instructs us to submit to one another out of love. (Ephesians 5) Submission is about about role, value, or supremacy, it's about love. Just as Jesus did not demand the honor due Him (Philippians 2), we are to do the same. This is not just for women-men, but for all believers. We are to submit to one another because the one we modeled did that for us.
@leadworshipper82 - I recently wrote a paper on the topic of the role of women in scripture. You brought up the issue of primogeniture (that which is first has a greater position/honor) Three points.
1) God often overturns primogeniture in scripture. He often honors the younger over the older (Jacob-Esau, David, the 12 tribes, etc.)
2) The name Adam gives Eve pre-fall is "woman." It literally means 'this one is like me!' The name given post-fall is "Eve." It could very well be argued that a man's authority over woman is a result of the fall, and that as Christians our job is not to perpetuate the curse, but to reverse it.
3) we don't follow primogeniture in other areas of our culture. We don't give our firstborn a double inheritance, as instructed by scripture. Our oldest child is not expected to be the sole provider for their parents in their old age. They are not expected to avenge the wrongs done to their family. If we do not follow primogeniture in every other area of our culture, why do we cling to primogeniture beliefs in other areas, such as the "Adam was created first and is therefore 'greater' " argument?
I'm not saying that men and women are exactly the same. As noted by others, they are generally different. However, I don't think primogeniture is necessarily a strong argument in favor of male headship.
God's a sexist, racist, murderer and psychopath.
I believe that in every country where Christianity has been introduced, it has led to greater freedom and longer life spans for women. I believe I heard this said on the radio recently. Look at ancient Rome... women used to be considered the property of men. Christians believed women ought to have a say in who they marry, and so that meant Christian women married later (not when they were too young to have kids) and didn't die in childbirth as often. The coming of the feminazis in the modern era is what is responsible for the modern insane drivel which tries to make Christianity oppressive of the rights of women. Examine history... and look beyond the limits of the western world as well.
@AnchorsAwayx@xanga - Shekhinah (alternative transliterations Shekinah, Shechinah, Shekina, Shechina, Schechinah, שכינה) is the English spelling of a grammatically feminine Hebrew language word that means the dwelling or settling, and is used to denote the dwelling or settling presence of God (cf. divine presence), especially in the Temple in Jerusalem. (from wikipedia.org)
Please do your homework. In the original Hebrew, Shekinah is used to refer to God and it is a feminine term.
I believe God is neither male nor female. Seems clear to me that God chooses to identify Himself chiefly in the Bible as male so that we puny humans can (try to) understand one of the most important aspects of His existence- His power. Genesis begins with God creating the world. Why? "... because anyone who comes to him must [1] BELIEVE that he EXISTS and that [2] he REWARDS those who [3] EARNESTLY SEEK HIM." Hebrews 11:6
totaly agree. my uncle is like this and he has one daughter and 2 sons and his sons are already bossing their older sister around and she does EVERYTHING for them bc its the "womans role as stated in the Bible" and like my cousin is trying to be more like right...and she was like "oh what if i dressed like erica?" (which i was wearing shorts and shes only allowed to wear skirts) and my uncle said "well i would tell you to go put some clothes on" and she said "what if i was married and in my own house?" and he said "i would tell you to go put some clothes on...then yell at your husband for letting you dress that way"...and she doesnt understand why im going to nursing school because she thinks that all women are supposed to be stay at home moms that are at their husbands every beck and call...its so horrible and heartbreaking to me to see her at the age of 13 already in this mindset that all women are men's slaves.
im so happy my momma got us out of that kind of church and taught us right.