Friday, 22 May 2009
-
ROMOT: Would You Rather Be a Rock Star or a Movie Star?
by revelife crew
It's Friday again, and that means it's time for ROMOT (Revelife Outreach Meet Others Thing)! This is where we encourage everyone to meet each other through comments and friending.
The game: we ask a question, and after you comment, drop by the site of the commenter above you and say hi, friend or sub to them! They'll appreciate that you took the time to drop them a line.
Which would you rather be: a rockstar or a movie star?
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)

















Comments (22)
ROCK STAR. No doubt.
Movie Star.
Movie star.
I think I'd be a much better rockstar when one considers how well I can compose lyrics. My only problem would be that I can't play an instrument....
Well, I'm already a rock star, so...
Lol, sorry. Neither one, really. I like living quiet.
Metal Rock Star so the media leaves me alone. I would be the next Mikael Akerfeld(Opeth)
I've wanted to both act and sing. But if I had to pick one or the other, I'd pick musician. You can connect with people through your craft better than if you were a movie star.
@Lynnjynh9315@xanga - Neither can a lot of these pop starlets *hehe*.
I couldn't handle the fame and money. I couldn't choose either.
I love rock!!! But once u got no inspiration to write good songs then its pretty screwed up. So movie star! I love acting too lol
I would rather be a duck.
ROCK STAR HECK YESS
Rock stars and movie stars have one thing that I do not have: talent.
I studied acting and it was boring. However, being able to Eddie Van Halen all the way up the guitar neck at whim and fancy would be AWESOME!!
Rockstar without a doubt!
movie star
Neither one, thank you. I like traveling and seeing new places, but the life they lead is not for me.
I think it would be awesome to be a movie star, but I don't really have too much talent for acting....a rock star would be awesome too, I'm really into music. But I think a movie star would get more money!
movie =)
i wont be toned deaf at the age of 35
These are both horrible choices. No one in their right mind would want to be either of these. But if I absolutely had to pick one, it would be an actor. Because I am a musician, and have been in several hard rock and metal bands over the years. There are NO decent people who are rock stars. I have been inside this lifestyle, and I want no part of it. I love the style of music, but as people, these are the biggest scumbags on Earth. They're worse than car salesmen, lawyers, cops, televangelists and politicians all rolled into one.
Movie star is a good choice to me since I'm not good at singing. =]
Why in the heck can't I choose both?
I suppose if I HAD to choose one... it might be rockstar. I've been singing and dancing since I was small (and still do with a hair spray can in hand when no one's around). I like performing.
hands down: rock star! I already pretend to be one in my car and at concerts....