Friday, 09 January 2009
-
Have You Ever Heard of New Monasticism? A Brief Intro...
Guest post submitted by TheGreatBout
A lot of people ask me about my way of living. I live in the Agape Community House. What that means is I live with 6 (soon to be 8) other followers of Jesus. We are unified in our desire to live in a way that deepens Christian fellowship between brothers and sister as well as strengthens the bond between the kingdom of G-d and the local community in which we reside. This is a new endeavor for all of us. We don’t have a lot of success stories or continual ministries happening right now but G-d is faithful and as we grow together in this house we will learn to grow into our neighborhood and our city with the Gospel leading the way.
What we are doing is often called New Monasticism by people such as Shane Claiborne and Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove (two authors I will be exposing you to in the net several months). Honestly, there is no official working definition for new monasticism. Vaguely, it is people who are committed to following Jesus and his way living closely together in community (houses, neighborhoods, communes, etc) for the sake of deepening fellowship and serving the community they are residences of with the Good News of Jesus Christ while growing in discipleship.
At the bottom of this post are some resources I find to be helpful when searching for a new way of living by means of new monasticism.
“As we looked together at the long sweep of the church’s story (as an extension of Israel’s story), we began to see that the church’s response to compromise and crisis has consistently been on of new monastic movements…
When the emperors made Christianity legal and offered the favors of their Empire in the 4th century, the Dessert Fathers and Mothers began the first monastic movement by fleeing the centers of power and creating alternative communities in the desert. In the midst of the Crusades, as religious violence raged, St. Francis rejected economic privilege and started a new monastic movement.…The Anabaptists of the 16th century sought to establish a community of authentic Christian witness over and against the corrupt state churches in Europe. Likewise, slaves in the United /states cultivated a liberation theology and tradition of subversive song in the underground churches of “Christian” plantations. In an age when “Christian” America is the “last remaining superpower” in an all-out “war on terror,” we’ve begun to think that once again it is time for a new monasticism. Indeed, this is how we see the Spirit moving in North America today” (Rutba House, pages ix-x).
So many others say what I want to with such eloquence that I can only refer you to their words with great agreement and joy. This is one of those times. This is what is in my heart and what I want to share with you all. Hopefully it will be enjoyable and educational for you.
Resources:
1. New Monasticism Website
2. The Simple Way
3. New Monastics Library Series
4. The Celtic Way of Evangelism by George Hunter III
5. Irresistible Revolution by Shane Claiborne
6. Jesus for President by Shane Claiborne
7. New Monasticism by Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove
8. 12 Marks of a New Monasticism by The Rutba HouseWhat are your thoughts on New Monasticism?
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)



True












Comments (26)
If I could still use toilet paper, and be able to catch the food network, maybe I'd consider it :)
I think it's an inspiring way to live. And makes us really come to terms w/ what material possessions we deem valuable.
What's wrong with the "old" monasticism?
@Ancient_Scribe@xanga - I am wondering the same thing.
@Ancient_Scribe@xanga - Agreed.
@Ancient_Scribe@xanga - @MysteriumFidei@xanga @walkintotheseaaa@xanga - - I'm
not an authority in neo-monasticism by any means, but I am one of the "soon to be eight" mentioned in the post. New monasticism developed largely out of evengelical and post-evangelical culture, a series of semi-independent, spontaneous movements that valued all the traditional aspects of monasticism, but had to modify the form for their own church polity.
The easiest example is that in all of the major monastic orders (Benedictine, Cistercian, etc.), the monk takes a vow of celibacy. Neo-monastic communities expect celibacy from single members, but also permit and celebrate marriages and families. The Agape Community House in Findlay has two married couple one of which has two children, and four single adults.
As far as I know, nobody involved in any of the new monasticism projects believes there is anything wrong in classical monasticism. Perhaps there are individuals here and there who think differently, but the idea of new monasticism isn't to update a faulty system, but to adapt monastic principles to an evangelical and/or anabaptist lifestyle (depending).
I think fads and trends in Christianity aren't always a good thing...and really deserve a long, hard look before we pronounce them to be the best way.
@NightCometh@xanga - Despite its name, there's really nothing at all new about neo-monasticism.
Why did you censor "God"?
@sirnickdon - I lived in Lima (near Findlay) for 25 years, but I didn't know anything about this. I think I told you about a commune on the outskirts of Lima which existed in the early 70's for a year or so. The people there were Charismatic Catholics from the early period of that movement and believed that they were called to live as much like the New Testament church as possible. I know this is not exactly what neo-monasticism is as you are describing it, but it did require some of the same life-style and commitments.
I will be greatly interested to hear how all this works for you and your wife. God's best to you!
@xsherryxkimx@xanga - There are Jewish practices in which people do not write or say the names of G-d. Instead, they remove the vowels, exchange letter like V for W (YHWH) or create entirely new names like Adonai (or more currently, Jehovah) or Hashem for a less formal occasion. Adonai is used only for liturgy. Hashem is more of a conversational. Anyhow, to do these sorts of things shows a respect for the name of G-d since it is the name above all names.
Also, there is Jewish superstition which suspects that if one writes the name of G-d on paper and it is thrown away/burned or it is typed and later deleted, then they have disrespected the name of G-d and therefor sinned.
For me, it reminds me of the nature of G-d and is a practice of reverance. Perhaps I should submit a blog for the front page about it?
This post is yet another example of a Christian in search of a label.
"Neo-Monasticism?" Who cares?!
Lumen Gentium or Gaudium et Spes anyone? These documents from the Second Vatican Council spell out in spades the beauty of authentic Christian life and identity.
@LoBornlite@xanga - While I think that all Christians should by default be defined by vows of communal living, relative poverty, nonviolence and service to the communities around them, too often they're not. So if I mean those specific things, that I live in an intentional communal group, committed to nonviolence and practical service, intentionally located in the heart of the city's poverty, opening its doors for open meals, working with homeless initiatives and co-ops, etc.... if I mean I live like that, what word should I use?
To call that lifestyle Christian just isn't descriptive enough. So to call me a Christian in search of a label is perfectly accurate. What label do you prefer to neo-monasticism, which I agree sounds both needlessly complex and possibly somewhat arrogant.
What word can we find or develop that means those specific vows in that specific context?
@sirnickdon - As King Solomon said, there is nothing new under the sun. However you choose to live, "neo" it's not.
@LoBornlite@xanga - Yeah, let's get rid of the prefix. What other would do you think would describe it better? I think that just 'monasticism' gives the wrong ideas, because there's no monastery involved, also because members are free to marry, etc.
So what word can we find or develop to refer specifically to this way of responding to Jesus' call? I don't think just calling it "Christian living" works, because that implies that 99% of professing Christians aren't living like Christians.
Since "new monasticism" is already widely accepted, I am willing to stick with it for all its linguistic shortcomings, unless I get a better idea. After all, I still call New York New York, and not just York, wisdom of Solomon notwithstanding.
@sirnickdon - The Catholics describe three basic subdivisions: clergy, religious, and laity.
The clergy and religious actually take vows to poverty, chastity and obedience. The laity, when they marry make the same vow only in marriage, the spouses are united as one flesh.
What you describe is a charism similar to the Focolare Movement in the Catholic Church. Google Focolare and check it out. This movement was born out of the ashes of World War II. "Focolare" is Italian for "hearth."
So to answer your question, you folks need a wonderfully specific name for yourselves; a name for your movement or charism (gift). Calling yourselves neo-whatever would not only be untrue (since it has been done before), but it would not do justice to the importance of what you are doing.
A name is different than a label. Neo-whatever is a label soon forgotten. A name can go down in history.
@LoBornlite@xanga - That's a great and informative answer. I will Google Focolare and look into it.
@sirnickdon - Hopefully, when you look up the Focolare Movement, you won't be put off by their deep reverence for Mary, Mother of God. The Catholics have a thing for Mary that really rubs Protestants the wrong way.
Nevertheless, the lifestyle and values that you profess seem very similar to those of the Focolare Movement.
@TheGreatBout@xanga - Before starting the Agape Community House, did any of y'all have experience with living in a new monastic community? Or did y'all visit houses such as The Simple Way? Do you have any advice for someone such as myself that would love to start such a community?
I took a class with Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove in 2007... he co-taught with a traditional-monastic Sister from Oregon. And our classmates were from many different faith traditions: some Sisters from Minneapolis, an Episcopalian deacon, and Episcopalian minister, a couple Lutherans, a Covenant Evangelical pastor and his wife, and some seeking degrees in Catholic studies (or something similar...). We developed lasting friendships and a deep respect for each other and the traditional- and neo-monastic movements. I had the beautiful experience of sharing the Eucharist with the monks whose monestery and university hosted the course, all while immersing myself in traditions that I was not exposed to as small-town Lutheran.
What I encountered was some of most authentic community experience in my life. Never have I been so spiritually stretched, lovingly recieved, and more called to a Way of life that serves my Jesus.
My husband and I feel called to live in community in this manner. I was thrilled to see it featured on Revelife
Praise God!
I must say, excellent intro to new monasticism. All of those books and areas researched, I have grown to really enjoy. New monasticism is a good change in the Church, I've been looking in staying at the simple way to see such a community.
Have you looked at Rob Bells "Jesus wants to save Christians"? I found that to be quite well written and very interesting.
@TheGreatBout@xanga - I'm pretty sure your god doesn't care if you burn his name spill coffee on it or throw it in the trash. Words mean nothing, and your god does not need them to communicate therefore you should follow in its footsteps and use its name.
@HeartOfPandora@xanga - Actually, God makes it pretty clear in the Old Testament not to use His name in vain, or defile it in any way. Many in the Jewish tradition do exactly what TheGreatBout said to avoid defacing His name, whether that's cool with you or not.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/g-d.html
http://www.jewfaq.org/name.htm
"In any case, it would be inappropriate and opposed to Jewish values to correct or shame a person for keeping this practice if it is done out of respect and reverence for God."
http://judaism.about.com/od/reformjudaismfaq/f/god_spelling.htm
Also, God did communicate in words throughout scripture, especially the Old Testament (and if you want to get technical, Jesus is the Word made flesh), so words are important.
@walkintotheseaaa@xanga - Your god did not write the bible, though, crazy old men wrote the bible. Besides, using YWEH (I think that's how it goes?) is just another name, which refers to the same idea and so it also could be demeaning. And you said only not to use its name in vain, that doesn't mean not to use it at all.
Besides, if your god sends people to Hell for spilling coffee on its name...y'all have bigger problems than what to call it.
@HeartOfPandora@xanga - I never said the words "God wrote the Bible" because, physically, that is not true. However, I do believe the Bible was divinely inspired (which means, yes, God wrote the Bible, but not really at the same time), which is the teaching of the Church.
Also, the use of "YHWH" (or variations) generally does not occur, because disrespect can accidentally (or intentionally) occur. The use of the name "God" is avoided and replaced with "Lord," which is not His name,and it therefore okay.
I'm no expert of Jewish tradition. I am not Jewish.
Not taking the Lord's name in vain is one of the commandments, up there with adultery and murder, so obviously it's a big deal, especially with the orthodox. If that bothers you, that's your thing, not mine.
Also, your attacks on my reply (which were uncalled for, especially since I wasn't preaching, I was only explaining a part of Jewish tradition in a very frank, factual way) and my Christian religion will never change my convictions, and I do not wish to change yours.
Have a good night.
@ambreguesa@xanga - No. We are all new to this. We all have studied the NM but it's a new experience for all of us, which is exciting. We'd like to spend more time talking with other communities like Potter Street and Rutba house (who we've actually spoken to slightly). You get started by looking deeper into what this sort of lifestyle consists of, and search for a community with opening (thesimpleway.org or theopendoorcommunity.org are good starts)