Wednesday, 23 July 2008
-
What Makes Cloning Worse Than Fertility Treatments?
by mr pine
Lately, I've become a little addicted to the show Jon & Kate Plus 8 on TLC. It's about a family who underwent fertility treatments with in-utero insemination and had sextuplets (6 babies). Unlike in in-vitro fertilization, with in-utero insemination, there are no embryos that are left over, so if there are multiple viable embryos, they all have the chance to develop naturally. Based on the show, the family seems devoutly Christian, which is likely the main reason they decided not to "reduce" once they found out that they were going to have six.
It got me thinking - are the same people (specifically Christians), who are against human cloning similarly against fertility treatments? I suppose it would depend on why cloning is objectionable to them. If it's about the embryos that have to be destroyed to create a clone, what if there were a way where all of them could live? If it's about "playing God" with who is brought into this world and who is not, wouldn't fertility treatments, especially induced fertilization, be just that? Is it that one procedure can "create a soul" while the other cannot?Clones themselves are not anything unusual. Any set of identical twins is essentially a pair of genetic clones, but I don't think anyone would argue that in a set of twins, only one of them has a soul. (Trivia: twins do not have identical fingerprints, so in the case of ruling out one twin over another, DNA testing would be the inferior forensic method.)
Years ago, it could have been considered "playing God" to transplant a heart from one person to another, or even creating a mechanical heart to do the work that the "God-given" heart stopped doing. In fact, I'm sure no human during the time the Bible was written could have possibly even conceived of either of those things happening.
Perhaps it's that clones will potentially have no parents. At least with fertility treatments, the baby will have a mother and father to take care of him or her. But what if there is a family there? Consider a family where a parent has a 50% chance of passing a genetic disorder to the next generation. They want to use cloning to extract the DNA from one parent (or even a sister or brother) who does not have the disorder. Does this make it okay? Is there something about needing a sperm and an egg from each parent to make a "real" child? And additionally, does that mean the egg or sperm donation is not allowable?
Could it be that creating a person who is just a copy of another person (minus the years of life experience) is merely something that seems so "unnatural" that people are repulsed by it? Perhaps there is a reason why many Christians and non-Christians alike share the same opinion about human cloning. But maybe sometime in the not-so-distant future, if human cloning becomes commonplace, the revulsion will subside.
I know that the Roman Catholic church bans birth control largely because of the belief that only God should decide who is born and who isn't. So I would think that most Roman Catholics would have no struggle denying cloning and fertility treatments - both are not kosher... well, not literally "kosher" but you know what I mean (which makes me wonder, what's the Jewish viewpoint on this whole issue?)
Obviously, this is not something that the Bible addresses directly, but can we extrapolate from what we know of God's character in the Bible to understand how we should deal with this? There are stories that show demonstrations of faith by barren couples who conceive through God's blessing. But is going to any medical treatment showing a lack of faith in God's provision?
I also wonder if there are non-Christian (or non-religious) people who are against human cloning and/or fertility treatments, and what their reasons are.
So is this something you have thought about? Are your views on one over the other different? If so, why?
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)
















Comments (41)
I love that show and am so bummed that I'm not able to watch it anymore.
I haven't thought any about human cloning, but I do have this one question: Why would we want to make more humans if we can't take care of the ones we already have?
I have noticed when it comes to these types of things, Christians seem to be against only what doesn't apply to them but they look the other way if it could benefit them somehow. Personally, I've always wondered how Christians can be against abortions but at the same time not against certain fertility treatments, namely the ones that go beyond just assisting the sperm to reach the egg (hormones, drugs, etc). If it's wrong to play God, go against God's will, and kill a human life, then why isn't it also wrong to play God, go against God's will, and create a human life? You're still messing with what God decided. If you are having difficulty conceiving, why not just accept that perhaps that is your lot in life and not go to extreme measures attempting to change the course God has decided your life should take the same way those who abort do (just with a different outcome)? Isn't it equally selfish to go against what God has designed your body to do within natural parameters? I know abortion wasn't mentioned in this post, but to me fertility treatments, cloning and abortion are all in the same field here.
I once had a Christian tell me that babies born of in-vitro fertilisation were possessed by the Devil because they were not created naturally. And therefore, they shouldn't be baptised or welcomed into churches.
It was disgusting really.
I am still opposed to transplants.
I think humanity's technological level has reached a stage where we are capable of "playing God", to a certain extent. At the rate we're going, in the not so distant future, cloning can become more efficient and we may even be able to produce "super humans" by removing defected genes. In fact, we may even be able to enhance the capability of humans by cybernetic implants and injecting nanobots into ourselves. It's no longer science fiction, but a possible reality. It's just a matter of time at the rate we're heading. All these are humanity's vain quest for immortality...
In fact, humanity today is even capable of wiping ourselves off the face of the planet; there are tens of thousands of nuclear warheads stockpiled capable of destroying earth many times over.
All these "playing God" genetic experiments can have disastrous consequences. The Doomsday Virus was created accidentally, and fortunately was contained. It may just be a matter of time before someone somewhere accidentally created a lethal biological agent causing a pandermic. In fact, secret military experiments might already have created such biological weapons, unrevealed to the public.
Reminds you of the tower of babel, doesn't it? We truly are living in the last days.
@Red_Apocalypse_Horse@xanga - Actually full-out removing genes would cause death or severe retardation. Not immortality.
I don't think that it is a good idea to take part in cloning, abortion, treatments, or even birth control. These these I feel interfere with God's plan and often give us too much control to ignore what is planned for us. While many situations may cause one to feel they are needed...it should be an indicator that something else is wrong.
In turn to answer the question, I think cloning and fertility treatments are equally wrong. But that's the Roman Catholic in me..
My mom was Pro-Life...and remember, so was yours!
@docsfancyskip@xanga - If we use birth control and an unplanned pregnancy doesn't come to be, isn't that God's plan? isn't everything that happens God's plan?You can't argue that humans ever play God or change God's plan, because His plan will always be His plan whether or not we choose to use birth control. He knows from the beginning whether or not someone is going to be born or not.
This reminds me of something I've always wondered about - if you oppose abortion, should you oppose the death penalty as well? I say they are a different animal, but I don't say that with 100% confidence because you can't pick and choose where to value life.
My initial view is I don't agree with cloning, but in-vetro and especially in-utero is fine. Plus, if I was in a situation where I couldn't conceive, I would probably pray about in-vetro, in-utero, and adoption. Also, all I can think about is that if it weren't for in-vetro, my fiance and his 2 amazing triplet brothers would not be here!! I often wonder whether or not God gave us those methods to make up for the various sicknesses and disorders, etc that make it difficult for couples to conceive. Who knows what I'd do in that situation! I say pray about it..if you feel led to fertility treatments then it's probably God's hand working in a seemingly unconventional way.
I'm all for cloning- I really think it's the only way to determine whether certain things actually are genetic or not.
Ok, I'm Christian and I hold to the view that I am still against abortion but I'm not against cloning, stem cell research, or fertility treatments, or birth control. I'm against abortion because it is simply the killing of life. But to me that issue has been so beaten to death that I think many Christians are missing the point. The truth is, every one of us are committing sins everyday that are just as bad as abortion in God's eyes.
To me, cloning, stem-cell research, and fertility is one of Gods ways of bringing life into this world. Even though you may keep arguing about how it is playing God and its not really our place, I listen to the protesters who are supporting stem cell research that could find treatments and cures for such diseases as parkinsons disease. Yes, this is provided that you are responsible for that life that is coming into this world through fertility treatments or cloning. There's a lot of people crowding this world and you have to make a decision whether you want to bring this child to compete for scarcity of resources in this world. At the same time, I also think about the positive impact that a born child could make in this world. Whether it is through cloning or fertility treatments I don't really care. What matters is that God gave us a gift of life. And if we are responsible for that life. There can be at least some good that comes from that life.
Pro-Life, Anti-Gay Marriage and any huge Christian protest really honestly disgusts me because you are missing the point! Our faith has been built on one man who is Jesus. Do you honestly think he would be the religious fanatics that we have become? Why are there people killing or attacking abortionists? Why are there people denying other the gift of life and why are we pushing the gay community so far away when our faith was built on one thing which is love.
Like I said already, at the end of the day we all commit sins that are just as bad as abortion and other sins. In God's eyes there is simply no difference.
I'm amazed that abortion enters into this conversation. Assisting in life, ( in-vitro, in-utero) trying to create life (cloning), and taking life (murder, abortion) are not even in the same league.
I'm stunned that so may Christians have connected the two in their minds somehow. One comment (so far) even eluded to a similarity between a person who has, by being convicted of committing some heinous act, earned a penalty of death according to the laws of our land, fully knowing that death was certainly a possible consequence for his actions, to the hideous murder of a defenseless and innocent baby.
Whether you agree with in-vitro, in-utero, cloning, birth control or not was the issue, wasn't it? I can NOT fathom how abortion worked itself into this conversation amongst Christians in such a nonchalant and cavalier manner.
I think we are just trying to say, or at least I was, that some people believe one issue is okay, but not a related issue. Which is perfectly valid.
You could argue that with in vitro fertilization or other aids to help people conceive children you are still leaving the development of the zygote up to chance or providence. You're just helping the delivery. Cloning is something altogether different. You are not helping a sperm and egg meet and implant into a woman's uterus. You are taking genetic material from one person to imprint on another cell. A true to the sense of the term test tube baby. You are not leaving anything in the development of the zygote up to chance of providence. You are in a sense telling the zygote what kind of child to grow up to be.
You don't need to clone in order for the continuation of the human race. You don't need IVF, either, but it could come to that some day and it, unlike cloning, still leads to DNA crossing.
You stated that clones aren't anything different than identical twins, but you're wrong. Identical twins are the natural product of a zygote splitting. Clones are the product of a human interfering with the process of creation.
You also stated that transplants are also a way of playing God, but that is a fallible comparison. Transplants are used to prolong life. You don't use cloning a child to cure or ameliorate disease directly (unless you say you are cloning to make a child for a bone marrow transplant, in which case that's just despicable).
Perhaps it's God working through us to do his will, no?
My mum had several miscarriages before I was born. With the doctors' help, she received some special treatment so that her next baby (me) could actually stay and develop in her womb. If she hadn't been treated like that, I wouldn't be here.
For everybody who are against fertility or similar treatments, my message is this: I am happy to be born, to be alive and to be a child of God!
I definitely do not think that treatments that support new life are against God's will or Christianity or whatever. On the contrary, I think it is God's blessing that these days we have discovered the means to enable families with fertility problems to have offsprings. And in a similar way, i see no problems with organ transplans, either!
As for cloning, it is such a complex issue that I am still developing my point of view about it, this is definitely not something we can regard as a "black or white" thing.
When we discussed this during in a contemporary ethics committee, my group and I came to the conclusion that although the actual act of cloning is not inherintly wrong, it is the intentions of the person who is creating the clone that is in question. Why would you create a clone of yourself or another person? What would you do with a child who was cloned from an already living and breathing person? Would you encourage the same talents or try to foster new ones? If you have a clone yourself, wouldn't you essentially be raising yourself? Why would anyone do that? etc.
One other thing. Show me a scripture in the Bible where it says that a clone doesn't have a soul. God breathes life into every person, and I completely agree with the twins analogy. All sentient life has a soul. What a rediculous notion to think otherwise.
AWESOME POST! Definately food for thought. You said so much, I don't even know where to begin.
My views: I do not think that cloning is right nor do I think that it is really in the will of God for homosexuals to visit sperm banks and embro cventers to create babies because they are unable to with their partners (I know this is a bit in left field). I think when we do this, we are playing God and asking God to bless something that He is completely against and then raise the children in this enviornment which is contaminating them.
On the other hand in cases of marriages where there is something physically wrong with the woman where she can't conceive but can carry a child, I look at it as God making a way out of now. Not all of these babies survive so they are even more of a miracle than those of us that were conceived the old-fashioned way.
I do however find it somewhat selfish for these couples to opt to go this route ( I work in a OB/GYN practice that does invitro)There are too many children in the world that do not have parents for us to use all the resources to be able to say that we have "our own" children when our children are not really our own but belong to God.
I in no way mean to offend any of those that were born via invitro or those that may have had the procedure themselves. Nor do I intend to offend the gays or their children or anyone else that may have been offended. These are just my personal views.
Another interesting part of your comment was the comparison between heart transplants and artificial inseminations: you've got me there. Culturally, it is acceptable (for most) and viewed as a God-given second chance for someone to obtain a new organ and be given a chance to start all over again. I realize that this is somewhat of a double standard.
I know that God uses people, places and things as He sees fit. I know that all things were made by God and without Him was nothing made so He allows transplants and such things so I can't really disagree with it if He has blessed it.
@harmonyminusmelody@xanga - Does that mean murder, and violence are okay with God? I mean, he let's it happen so does that make it okay? I guess I see a flaw with that way of thinking..
Don't most couples who go through fertility treatments do so because they cannot conceive naturally?
neither fertility treatments nor cloning are trusting in the Natural plan,
both assume (wo)man's desire coupled (no pun intended) with man made technology can override the Source design.
fertility treatments often equal TOO MANY "viable" life forms:
danger to the mother, health complications all around
(not to mention/it goes without saying) what about all the children
ALREADY HERE that need loving homes, to ignore this and spend energy
and expense to "conceive" "our own" is plain VANITY.
( a stint on the talk show circuit, corporate sponsorships and if you're lucky, a TV show?)
as for cloning, see the indie film - CODE 46
oh and- what are the technological advancements that make these procedures possible if not EVOLUTIONARY ?- hmmm.
I don't think any of these things interfere with God's plan. They perhaps devalue life, and that is my problem with them, but the idea that you "play god" is just silly. As if God's up there going: "Oh no, they transplanted a heart into that person, now he won't die at the right time! What am I going to do?"
Give me a break. God is in control of it all. He can decide whether any of this stuff works or not. Do we need to be responsible and seek His wisdom in it...certainly. Are we "interfering" with his ultimate plan? Not at all. What kind of God would we serve if the stupid decisions of man derailed His ultimate plan.
Finally, I say from experience that we cannot stop what God is doing. If it's someone's time to go it's his time to go. My dad had lung cancer. They did chemo, radiation, removed his lung and declared him completely cancer free. A month later...he choked on a grape and died. It was his time. Did all that chemo and radiation keep him around for 6 months longer than God intended...I think not!
@Be_A_Revolution@xanga - very very good point. As someone who is involved with an orphan ministry at church, I think this is a pivotal question to ask.
@BohemianLamb - I don't think it's the "playing God" aspect of it that Christians are against. It's the ending of a life.
@harmonyminusmelody@xanga - I think that maybe what he's referring to is not God's plan but rather His will, which we go against all the time.
Your titel is outrageiuosly loaded and doesn't deserve an answer.
CLoning and fertility treatments are merely scientific ways of helpiing life along. Thai nonsense that it is "playing God" doesn't wash as presumably, God would sttill have the choice of which treatmnet works and which doesn't.
Just utilise what sceintific advances we can. It is using our God-given minds after all.
Just a general comment about in-vitro fertilization and cloning.
One of the main issues currently about these methods is that they create and destroy embryos in the process. I've been told that in cloning, a great number of embryos have to be destroyed in order to produce a successful result.
This means that if you're against abortion in all forms, you should be against cloning and in-vitro fertilization for the same reason.