Tuesday, 15 July 2008
-
Testing God
Yesterday on the drive over to my sister's apartment, my 8 year-old nephew and I got into another conversation about God.Him: I tried to see if God were real. I bounced my ball and asked Him if He were real, to bounce the ball.
Me: And did God bounce your ball for you?
Him: No.
Me: Do you still believe in God?
Him: Yes... but why didn't God bounce the ball if He's real?
Me: Good question. Do you know what testing means? When someone says, "You're testing me," do you know what that means?
Him: No.
Me: Hmm... let me think about it and I'll get back to you.It made me sad to think that the little guy was doubting his belief in God because God wouldn't bounce the ball for him. I wanted so much to ask God to just bounce the ball for him so that he wouldn't lose his faith, but at the same time, I know that that's really selfish. I also didn't want to tell him that God is real and he has to believe in God regardless of the ball incident. I want him to believe fully on his own terms that God has set before him. People say that Christians are brainwashed into believing in God, but that's not the case at all. It is a decision that the individual makes for his/herself, based on experiences and faith in the Bible and God.
After thinking about it since yesterday, I've realized that God doesn't always do the things we ask Him to do, like proving His existence, because our requests are out of selfishness and lack of faith. God does things for His glory and His glory alone. When we test Him and ask Him to prove His existence, it's not giving Him any glory. It's like we're almost commanding God to show His face because we are such selfish beings that we need this for our own happiness, even if it brings no glory to Him.
So how do I explain that to an 8 year-old?
How do you feel about testing God? Do you catch yourself doing it often?
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)

















Comments (57)
there is the instance of Gideon who asked God to test the fleece he laid down each night for 3 night (i think)
but those are i think alright... i'm not sure...
i've never done that... but... sometimes I'd like to ask God to do something to prove that what God desires me to do He would show me in a fleece kind of idea...
but since we have the Holy Spirit... i think our stepping out in faith to do what God wants in contingent upon how close to God we are and how much we turn down the other noise in our lives....
You can say what you want to your kid. You might explain that God only reveals himself to those who has faith, etc.
But if you really want to believe that you're giving him the individual decision to choose his beliefs, then you had better not present any of this as fact. Tell him that you think
that's how it is. You can even tell him why. But if you say it's the
truth, then you are brainwashing him, even if you don't mean to do so.
Inherently, children need to believe and trust their parents. There
are all sorts of advantages to it, and it's a documented psychological
phenomenon. So, if you say to your son: "God exists!" then you are
brainwashing him. The only way to open his mind up to choice at all is
to say, "I believe in God, because _____, but some people don't. I
hope you choose the same path that I have chosen because _____, but if
you choose another, I will still love you, unconditionally." Even this
only works if you don't use overwhelmingly emotional arguments (e.g.,
"I hope you pick God because if you don't, you'll burn in hell").
Instead, perhaps, "I hope you pick the Christian God because my faith
has enriched my life, and I only want the best for you."
I'll
probably get jumped on for this, but I don't care. It's absolutely
true. I equate religious elitist brainwashing of children with most
other forms of psychological abuse. There is definitely an appropriate
way for you to talk to your children about God/religion, and you should, since it's important to you. But presenting it as the only option is wrong.
Just the way you did - 8 years is old enough to begin grasping abstract thought, and to appreciate real honesty. God doesn't answer to us, we cannot command Him, even under the guise of request or prayer. Hearing this, and beginning to learn this, at 8 years old would help the young man along in his spiritual journey considerably. He may not fully grasp the concept without some stories to lay it out, so perhaps start in the bible, reading the story of Balaam (Numbers 22) - explain how Balaam could acknowledge God, but thought by his actions and prayers he could change the will of God. Address the heart condition for your nephew.

God calls us to believe in Him as the true, omnipotent, unmanipulatable God of the Universe. He wants us to step toward Him in faith, so sometimes He does not choose to answer our prayers with yes. Or rather, as Paul explains, only when we align ourselves with God's desires, and our prayers join into His will, then He will give you the desires of your heart. As our hearts become more and more filled with desires for His glory, then we will see more and more of those desires come to fruition as He does His will.
You could introduce him to some of these scriptures to open more discussion, too:
Those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires.
~ Romans 8:5 ~
Delight yourself also in the LORD, And He shall give you the desires of your heart.
~ Psalm 37:4 ~
Sometimes your answer doesn’t have to be too complex, either – your simple confidence in who God is and your willingness to glorify Him will speak volumes.
One of the most often quoted verses in regard to this is when Jesus is tempted by the devil in the desert (Matthew 4). Here is the verse that Jesus quotes to refute Satan. "Do not test the LORD your God as you did at Massah" (Dueteronomy 6:16).
For a brief review at what happened at Massah: the Israelites grumbled against Moses and God (grumbled is more than doubt it is threats and attitude of bitterness, haha Marah means bitter, and Massah means testing. see Exodus 17). Remember that this group isn't asking for some sign of God's existence; they'd lived through the plauges of Egypt and the parting of the Sea. They know that God is mighty to save.
As for testing God, Abraham and Jacob are two fine examples of how God interacts with the friends of God. In no way does Abraham's famous barter (Genesis 18) or Jacob's wrestling match (Genesis 32) detract from God's glory. For other examples search for the stories of Gideon, Jeremiah, Peter, Paul, and most other people we look up to.
It isn't a matter of asking the questions, it might be a matter of the attitude behind the questions (James 1:19). As for your nephew, the rest of Deuteronomy 6 outlines a good plan to talk with youngsters (explain God's great acts of salvation, ie. the exodus, Christ's acts, death, and resurrection).
Beyond that it's up to your nephew and God and your prayers as you test...er... wrestle with God on the issue. Warning: being God's friend in such a way has been known to cause injury.
I don't think God minds an 8 year old asking that. I think you could mention that God doesn't always prove Himself by things we can see, but that God is showing Himself to your nephew by giving him loving parents, enough food, etc. I think an 8 year old could understand that. I don't think there's anything wrong with a child asking God to do something like that; God adores the simple, questioning hearts of children.
I also have to say that I intensely don't believe in letting children find their own beliefs. Because I honestly believe that nonbelievers are bound for hell, I believe we have a vital responsibility to teach our children God's truth. Of course, everyone must ultimately make his own decision, but Scripture commands us to instill the truth in our kids. I don't believe Christianity is one option among valid options; I believe it's the only right way; therefore, it would be unthinkably cruel for me to neglect telling my (future) children the truth as if it's the absolute truth. I would tell them that God is real and that the most important thing is that God loves them. It's not necessary to preach excessive fire and brimstone to a child in order to convey Christianity, but it is important to teach them.
Eh, not really. I know everything happens for a reason. When I was younger, I wrote God a letter and put it in my Bible, asking him to reply. Lol.
you asked for a possible way to explain to your 8 year old.
just a thought.... have him test you.... something like ... go hide.... but instruct him when you hide ... he is to tell you to bark like a dog if you are really in the house...... DONT ... let him come to you .... when he finds you then ask him... I didnt pass your test... does that mean i'm not in the house ... or something simple like that....
as far as testing God..... No... But the Holy Spirit, yes... to make sure it was HE that was whispering to me ....
1Jn4:1 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God because many false prophets have gone out into the world.
I wrote on this some time before, check it out,
http://weblog.revelife.com/skywalker/665245578/god-where-are-you-iii-end.html
When the Pharisees were asking for a sign, Jesus said they were evil and perverse, in Matthew, Luke and John, and in all four gospels He said "there shall be no sign given."
Here are some verses for you that might help.
Do Not Test God
Exodus 17:2,7, "So they quarreled with Moses and said, "Give us water to drink." Moses replied, "Why do you quarrel with me? Why do you put the LORD to the test?" And he called the place Massah and Meribah because the Israelites quarreled and because they tested the LORD saying, "Is the LORD among us or not?"
Deuteronomy 6:16, "Do not test the LORD your God as you did at Massah."
Psalm 78:18, "They willfully put God to the test by demanding the food they craved."
Psalm 106:14, "In the desert they gave in to their craving; in the wasteland they put God to the test."
Matthew 4:7, "Jesus answered him, "It is also written: 'Do not put the Lord your God to the test.' " (This was in reply to the devil who wanted him to harm himself to prove he was the son of God).
There are some areas we can test God in, but other than that we are not suppose to test him. When we want to know if something is really from God, we can use a 'fleece' as Gideon did. Gideon asked God to soak the fleece with dew and have the surrounding ground dry, as a sign that God's leading was real. When we ask God for direction we can ask him for a fleece - something that is otherwise impossible. However we should not demand he show us a sign that He exists or is real.
The Fleece
Judges 6:37-38, "Look, I will place a wool fleece on the threshing floor. If there is dew only on the fleece and all the ground is dry, then I will know that you will save Israel by my hand, as you said." And that is what happened. Gideon rose early the next day; he squeezed the fleece and wrung out the dew—a bowlful of water.
An Area We Can Test God In
Concerning paying our tithe, we are told to test God in this area.
Malachi 3:10, "Bring the whole tithe into the storehouse, that there may be food in my house. Test me in this," says the LORD Almighty, "and see if I will not throw open the floodgates of heaven and pour out so much blessing that you will not have room enough for it."
Signs
While Jesus was on Earth he said to the people of Cana,
"Unless you people see miraculous signs and wonders," Jesus told him, "you will never believe." (Matthew 4:48).
In this case he did perform a miracle but he wasn't too thrilled people wouldn't accept him on his word alone.
Matthew 16:4, "A wicked and adulterous generation looks for a miraculous sign, but none will be given it except the sign of Jonah." Jesus then left them and went away." (Also see Matthew 12:39) The sign of Jonah is referring to Jesus' death for 3 days where he would go down into the heart of earth, similiar to Jonah who was in the belly of the whale.
Faith
Hebrews 11:1, "Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see."
Faith believes in God without seeing him.
Hebrews 11:6, "And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him."
It's impossible to please God without faith. Do you see how your nephew came in doubt? 'Anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists...' if you don't believe he exists, how can you come to him in the first place?
Do Not Receive
James 4:3, "When you ask, you do not receive, because you ask with wrong motives, that you may spend what you get on your pleasures."
We don't always get what we ask for, if we ask with the wrong motives. I know this verse is refferring to money, but we can also apply this to other things we ask with the wrong motives.
James 1:6-8, "But when he asks, he must believe and not doubt, because he who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. That man should not think he will receive anything from the Lord; he is a double-minded man, unstable in all he does."
Doubt is also a major killer when we ask God for something. This verse in context is talking about asking for wisdom, but says you must not doubt when you ask or you will not receive anything.
When we find ourselves in such a doubtful situation, we can be like the man who Jesus helped.
Mark 9:24, "Immediately the boy's father exclaimed, "I do believe; help me overcome my unbelief!"
@la_faerie_joyeuse@xanga - I'll begin by saying that you're suggestion is anti-biblical. I know this is of little consequence to you, but you can hardly expect a Christian parent who genuinely believes that they are responsible for their child's spiritual formation is going to present religious belief in an unbiased fashion, let alone encouraging they find their own path, regardless of whether it's Christian or not. There are far too may commands in the Bible telling us to train our children in the ways of the Lord for us to do otherwise.
That said, your comment sparked some general questions, ones which may have absolutely nothing to do with your personal belief, but things I've always wondered:
First, why is it that when a child grows up, goes to college, and stops going to church, as over 60% of Christian teens do, they are said to be finding their own path/moving out from under their parents authority, yet if that same child remains in the Christian faith, their parents are said to have "indoctrinated them well"? It seems to me that such a catch-22 makes it so that a person raised in a Christian home can only be considered as thinking for his/herself if he/she denies Christ.
Second, why is all form of religious education branded as "indoctrination/brainwashing/psychological abuse"? There are many who may not see it this way, but I hear it all too often. To truly not ever assert my faith as fact to my son, I would have to make changes in my life which go completely against Biblical teaching. Apart from verses which tell me to raise him a Christian, I have to weigh in the fact that Christ told us to share the good news with everyone, and figure out what to do with that. And perhaps far more difficult than that, I'd have to find a way to PASTOR a CHURCH without ever affirming the Bible or any of the things in it which I believe to be absolute truth and fact. I would never compromise my faith or my calling just because someone thinks it will affect my child's development.
Third, with more and more psychological evidence pointing to a mental need for faith (Time magazine has featured several articles about genetic links to belief in G-d), why do people continue to suggest that teaching your child your specific faith is abuse? There are enough converts and apostates in todays world(just look at the % of church-goers by generation) that it does not appear religious education in the early formation of a child's life has a lasting effect, let alone a negative one. I know plenty of atheists who have such fond memories of church that they plan to take their children back in order for them to receive moral instruction. The few studies that support the idea that religious instruction= child abuse have been done primarily by atheists, and have based their claims off the fact that people who attended church in their youth experience residual feelings of guilt/remorse for actions that they were taught were wrong as children. Is this really child abuse? In my, admittedly biased, opinion, many of these people SHOULD be feeling guilty for their behavior...
i used to test god often. however, i eventually learned that there is no use in "testing" because there is ultimately no way to verify the god's fingerprint. however, i think one can make a well-informed judgment based on a combination of personal experience and examination of the historical validity of the religious text.
i eventually stopped believing because i couldn't reconcile the immense human suffering i encountered through various episodes of my life, and i personally find the bible to be frought with many--albeit minor--factual contradictions (there are also some larger value contradictions, but those arguments can only lead in circles). basically, a literal reading of the bible renders me unable to pursue faith in christianity due to the rejection of empirically verifiable cosmological, archaeological, and geological data; and a subjective reading of the bible feels as if i am only imprinting my own considerations onto the text.
It says straight up in the bible, do not test the lord your god
The difference between your son and Gideon is this: Gideon had faith to believe that God would answer him what he was asking about God's will.
Your son was asking God to prove Himself. He already did that through His Son on a bloody cross. He does it daily through His word. God doesn't want us to ask Him to prove Himself. Remember what Jesus said: A wicked and perverse generation seeks after a sign, but there will be no sign given except the sign of the Prophet Jonah.
Jesus' life (and workings therein), death, and resurrection ought to be enough proof for us to believe that God exists.
I hope that this helps.
I can't quite understand why people are acting like it's evil for an eight-year-old child to innocently think that if God exists, He would interact directly with the child. It's hard to understand abstract concepts at that age.
I believe God is delighted that your nephew is thinking about Him and trying to puzzle out His existence. Again, I think it might be helpful to point out God blessings-like enough food and a nice house-as evidence of His existence and love.
I don't believe there is one scrap of evil in what your nephew did; he's a child. Adults are not to test God, meaning practicing divination and saying things like, "If you're God, make this bullet I'm shooting into my head not kill me," or something like that.
I have actually heard multiple stories of people who asked God for specific signs and received them! In particular, and this is a true story, a youth pastor was driving down a bridge and saw someone standing on it. He felt a powerful urge to stop and say "purple ice cream" to the person, but felt like an idiot. Finally, the impulse was so strong that he got out and did it. The person immediately started crying and told him that at the end of their rope, they had prayed that if God was real, they wanted Him to show them by having someone say "purple ice cream" to them. Again, this is a true story.
Also, a family friend has a wild testimony of all of these different things he asked God to make happen before he would believe. I don't know all of them, but it was things like having someone in a random park who would offer him a Bible. God did every one of them, and our friend is a committed Christian today.
I think that testing God is when someone is just asking for a sign for the sign's sake and probably won't change their belief anyway. God honors people who have faith and accept His gracious proof by living for Him.
Again, I don't think there's anything evil in an eight year old wondering exactly how we know God is real. He's a little young to really understand the concept of feeling God's presence inside him, but he is old enough to see God in God's gifts around him.
just explain to your kid that God has just as much free will as we do. and if we have the ability to choose whether we worship Him, He certainly has the ability to ignore our requests. there's nothing in the Bible that says EVERY prayer is answered with an affirmative.
@too_pretty_to_die@xanga - I don't think He ignores them. He just knows which ones are good for us and which ones ultimately are not. The Bible says his ear is attentive to our requests, so I don't think the word "ignore" is exactly what I would use.
It's great that your nephew wants to know God personally. I pray that God will reveal Himself in a way that makes sense to him. God has been kind enough to show up in unexpected ways several times when I was at the end of my rope, and I'm sure He will give your nephew what he needs.
@easalien@xanga - It's an extremely painful irony that suffering would drive you away from the only source of real comfort. Since we were created in God's image, we have tremendous power to inflict damage on each other and the world around us. Rage at God is an understandable reaction. However, to cease to believe in God would be to accept that it is all meaningless and unredeemable. I would have a harder time living with that than with a God that I don't understand but who does offer redemption, comfort, and hope.
I've had several discussions along these lines with atheists and antitheists, many of whom take the line, "Well, if God exists, why doesn't he do X (which I believe to be impossible)?"
The answer I usually give is this: If X happened, that might prove that God exists, sure. But if X doesn't happen, that only proves that a God who does tricks at our command doesn't exist. Which most Christians already believe anyway. There are plenty of reasons to believe in God that have nothing to do with whatever X might be!
"He's not a tame lion!"
@shedinator@xanga - Ditto! Bravo! Very well said!
Christians are not brainwashed? It seems you don't have a dictionary. Unless, of course, this child is getting introduced to at least some of the major world religions. If he is only being talked to about Yahweh and Jesus, he IS being brainwashed. End of story.
@shedinator@xanga - Like I said, people SHOULD tell their children about their religion. However, they have to be careful to do it in a certain way so that it is not indoctrination. You have to admit that there are cases in which children are indoctrinated, and there are cases in which children grow up with a healthy understanding of religion. I'm just trying to encourage this poster - if she doesn't want to "brainwash" her kids - to let them have a choice in the matter.
When a child goes to college, they're moving out on their own regardless of what choices they make. I honestly don't care whether college students continue to do to church or not. I don't think that reflects on the parent's decisions, but more on the intense time constraints that college students are under, particularly if they're working. And, I also don't comment on parenting of kids who still do go to church in college. I think by the time you're in college, you're old enough to have made those decisions. The people that I DO comment on their childhood indoctrination are:
- People who struggled for years with self-hatred because of the religious teachings they received as children, or the ostracizing they received upon doubting the church.
-People who are religious, but their religion drives them to hate themselves or others
-People who have a burning hatred against other people based on their religion (or lack thereof).
Anyone else? No way.
And, as I was trying to point out, not all religious education is indoctrination, brainwashing, or psychological abuse. As I said, there is a right and wrong way to teach your children about religion.
Threats ("I'll kill you if you have sex before marriage"; "I won't love you anymore if you turn away from the Lord"; "If you don't eat your vegetables, you're going straight to hell!") are not okay. This is psychological abuse.
Lying (or deliberately omitting selective truths or justifications) is not okay. This is indoctrination/brainwashing.
Examples: "All atheists are evil satan-worshippers who have no sense of morality or ethics!"
Anything in which the justification is, "Because God said so," when presented as absolute truth, instead of a piece of the Christian faith.
"I would never compromise my faith or my calling just
because someone thinks it will affect my child's development."
Be careful about who "someone" is here. Your statement in this context is probably okay, but saying "never" is very dangerous. You have to admit that there are circumstances in which this position would NOT be appropriate.
You're absolutely right that there are several psychological sources for faith. Many people seek out faith, because they need it. I will absolutely not dispute that. What I will say is that, in addition to this instinctual need for religion, there are some individuals who are inherently unreceptive to religion. I am one excellent example - my mother taught me religion, and I never even understood how it worked. My brain simply doesn't operate like most people's do. For those individuals, it can be quite trying to, in some instances, have your entire family reject you for lack of belief.
Speaking from a scientific/psychological standpoint, I don't know anyone who would claim that rigorous early childhood religious education had little or no effect upon their development as a sovereign person. Could you find some evidence there? Simply saying that people convert is insufficient, as there are many more potential causes for that (if you'd like, I'll explore those further).
You're right that Church can often be a positive place. I have fond memories of church in my early teens when visiting relatives in memphis. I would not be opposed to taking my children to church, and I don't have a problem with anyone else doing so, unless the church is going to inspire habits or beliefs like those three cases I mentioned above.
"In my, admittedly biased, opinion, many
of these people SHOULD be feeling guilty for their behavior..."
Thanks for admitting your bias, though I tend to understand to some degree. However, think of how dangerous this might be for parents who believe that women should be absolutely submissive to men. That is, they should never hold jobs, should be expected to bear children at the man's whims, should only wear long skirts or dresses, or, perhaps, should wear a loose covering over their entire bodies, with only a slit for the eyes. There are muslim women who feel guilty for showing their nose in public. Is that really appropriate? There are gay individuals who feel so tormented by their families that they kill themselves. Is that appropriate?
simply say God is not a jukebox you can't just yell out things for him to do
that's a simple answer for an 8 year old
until when he's older can conclusively come up with his own decision whether or not God exists or not.
@la_faerie_joyeuse@xanga - I think, if I did not expressly say so in the first place, that I meant to include the fact that teaching personal bias- i.e. things not expressed in the Bible (many of your last examples are not) or using Christianity as a thin veil to excuse your own prejudice is not cool. The arguments for complete submission, women not working, the need to beat one's child on a regular basis, blacks being evil, etc. do not have a sound Biblical basis, if any. I know that to a non-Christian, it seems odd that I would say "well, if it's in the Bible, then it's okay to be assertive of it, but your own personal claims on further morality are not as acceptable," but you've also got to look at the text itself. Our moral code, for the most part, is universally accepted, apart from the worshipping Christ thing. Some would contend one point or another, but By and large, there's not much deniable truth in the Bible (The non-G-d related 10 commandments have served as a basis for many a non-religious judicial system). To equate someone claiming something as "Christian,"(women shouldn't have short hair, and men's shouldn't be long) with something expressly stated in the Bible(The man is responsible for the spiritual growth of his family, and should serve them wholeheartedly to the point of being willing to die for them) is simply grounds for a watered-down, unfounded brand of Christianity that is more like... ianity, because there's no Christ in it.
I will gladly teach my son about other religions, and if it isn't perfectly clear that I will love him regardless of his choices, then I've already failed as a parent, and he's barely 3 weeks old. But that won't stop me from also telling him that other beliefs are, plainly put, false. It won't stop me from saying that yes indeed there is a Hell, and although I'm not really sure what it is, I do know that it is for those who reject Christ. I won't hesitate to give him all the facts, but neither will I shy from telling him why I, my wife, our family, our church, etc. interpret the facts in the manner we do. I'm sure you've caught on by now that I'm a fairly rational, and pretty well-informed person, and I hope my son is the same, I wouldn't hide something from him for fear of damaging his faith. True faith can withstand all knowledge.
In regards to not having a lasting affect on a child's long-term existence, it is difficult to perform such a study from a simply psychological standpoint. If going to Sunday School til the age of 8 gave someone a sense of right and wrong, and although they've turned from Christianity they still have that sense, you might be able to claim that as a lasting effect, but on the other hand you could say that although Christianity did not hold up under experiential testing, the system of morality had proved itself. It all depends on your view of the human mind. I am of the believe that humans are constantly re-evaluating their entire belief system based on new facts that are presented on an almost daily basis. That's why we can look back 10 years and see how much we've changed, but generally we are unable to pinpoint when the change happened. In that sense, if over half of all children raised in Christian homes forego Christianity, they have determined that the belief system does not hold up under the scrutiny of their day to day lives. However, this does not mean that individual things they learned have not proven true, nor does the fact that these things HAVE proven true mean that they are deeply effected by religious experience, but rather that it provided them with conclusions that they later reached on their own.
Church attendance has stayed fairly level over the past few decades, yet as I've said before our youth do not seem to come back. This is also an indicator that for every teenager that leaves the church during college, we have someone showing up and filling that person's place. I think this indicates that adults will make their own religious decisions almost completely free of what they were taught as children.