Tuesday, 22 April 2008
-
Who Would Jesus Choose?
One thing that definitely has to be on a lot of minds is the upcoming Presidential Election. Am I right? Tonight is no different since it was/is the Pennsylvania primary (which has been claimed as a Hillary Clinton victory on CNN.com).I don’t want to talk about the candidates too much, but like every election, people have very different opinions about each of the candidates. Amongst Christians, the opinions can tend to revolve around a candidate’s personal and spiritual life more than their political history. I know Christians who don’t believe that neither Hilary nor Barack are really Christians, even though they go to church and speak openly about their experiences with Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. I know Christians who were die-hard Mike Huckabee supporters because he trained in a (legitimate) seminary to be a Minister before his political career took off. Others support John McCain because he’s a Republican and that’s who the Evangelical Christians are always supposed to vote for (you know, because we shouldn’t support homosexuals, abortion, or stem cell research – all of which the Democrats usually support).
From what I gather, there are a ton of Christians who want a Jesus-loving, Bible-thumping, abortion-condemning, gay-hating, Creation-believing President, because if that kind of person is in the Oval Office, then the rest of America will change, all the “evil” things we’ve allowed will be abolished, citizens will turn back tothe Lord, and God will bless our country again.
And maybe I’ve been too sarcastic and given away my position already, but I’m not entirely sure this is the direction American Christian voters should be taking.
As in, does it really matter if we have a Christian president?
Outside of the U.S., there are postmodern nations that are experiencing a revival in their Christian populations (e.g., Great Britain). And these Christians are realizing that their country is not necessarily going to change because the right* person is in the right office with the right staff. They have decided that their fellow citizens and neighbors will be changed only if they themselves go out into their communities to personally communicate and display Christ’s transforming love and grace.
Well, doesn’t that remind you of someone?
Jesus wasn’t born on this earth as a Prince. He didn’t lead the Jews to rebel against the Roman authority of his time. He didn’t seek any political office to change the laws of the land.
He went out amongst the people. He talked to them, hugged them. He ate with them, laughed with them. He healed them of incurable diseases but alsojust made sure his friends weren’t hungry while they were listening to him preach.
He chose to affect people through relationships, conversation, and companionship, not by sitting on a golden throne and signing his name to a thousand new laws. I guess he could have, but he didn't.
I think voting is absolutely important for all citizens – don’t get me wrong about that. We should continue to research the issues, take our stands, and vote, vote, vote. And the Presidential office is powerful and important, so I understand why Christians want to vote for a fellow Christian, I do. But no matter who the nation elects as President, I think God can use that person to carry out His will if He so chooses. And no matter what, God can (and wants) to use us too, so we must do our part! Christians or not, we as citizens have a responsibility to shape this country’s future and we cannot leave it solely to the politicians. But specifically as Christians, we have a responsibility to be Jesus to our neighbors. And we can take heart that the Holy Spirit gives us the power and strength to do even more than Jesus did while he was on earth.
I’m honestly really excited about this year’s election. But I’m also excited for the roles that each of us may take on in the next 4 years. How much will we be a force for change and good in our communities? How will that affect the U.S.as a whole? How will that look to our allies and enemies?
I hope you’re excited too.
----
* I don't mean right with a capital R, as in right-wing/conservative; right, as in, correct.
A note from the author:
hello there!
i just wanted to respond to the huge number of comments posted for this entry. if you don't know already, revelife is actually a collaborative effort by several different bloggers. so the views expressed in this entry may not necessarily be shared by all the bloggers (gosh, that sounds ridiculously "official").
anyway, first i just want to say that it's really great to see so many comments/responses/opinions. and second, it's frakking scary to be a featured entry! but honestly, i've really enjoyed reading everyone's comments. obviously, i did not think everyone would agree with my thoughts - i mean, hello... jesus + politics?! i was practically asking to be burned. but i was surprised by so many positive responses, from both christians and non-christians. the negative responses were welcomed too, because i really believe that open dialogue is necessary to learn and grow. and although some of the comments stung a bit, they have challenged my thinking and made me want to read and learn more.
since this was a blog entry, and not a Ph.D. dissertation, i won't expand too much on what i've already written or try to defend it. i think it is what it is - a snippet of my opinions! but i do want to share a little bit about myself since a few of you were asking. here it is:
1. i am not chris choi
.
2. i am (obviously) not an expert on politics or christianity.
3. i am a christian and what that means for me is that i realize that i am deeply, innately flawed and in need of someone to save me. for me, that savior is Jesus Christ, who as a man died to pay my debt, but as God conquered death on my behalf. he did these things so that i could have a fulfilling and meaningful life on earth now and an eternal (and equally fulfilling) one in heaven later.
4. i am still figuring out how my faith effects my entire life - my relationships, my work, my politics, my causes, my everything. i try to live out the things that Jesus taught, but i don't believe there is a cookie cutter mold for all christians.
5. my reference to the UK comes from my experience there as a missionary. "revival" may not have been the correct word in my example, but what i mean is that christians are rediscovering what it means to live as followers of Christ, and i believe they are breaking out of an antiquated christian mold while loving jesus christ more passionately than ever before. their numbers may be small, but their faith is completely sincere and alive and inspiring.
6. i voted for Clinton in the primary, but would be satisfied with Obama. however, i did once vote for Bush. i'm a registered Democrat, but i really liked Ron Paul as a candidate. i respect Huckabee for many things, one of which is that he was willing to make fun of himself on SNL! sorry, but i'm just not a fan of McCain at all.
7. i want to know who the final Cylon is! (*high five* if you get this)thanks again for visiting. come back anytime.
love&peace,
h
Please visit our siteoften!
Revelife is a bunch of christian writers talking about currentevents, the christian lifestyle, and life in general.You can visit us directly here:
http://www.revelife.com
Post a Comment
- Back to revelife's Revelife Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in revelife's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)















Comments (419)
i think jesus would choose no one. lol. every president hopeful has some warts.
Jesus would vote on one condition; free tickets to the Super Bowl.
I paraphrase (or might actually be right on) Mike Huckabee: "Jesus would have the good sense to stay out of politics". As a Christian, I don't think the mentality is there that if we have a Christian president, everything will be fixed, and we won't have to do anything. With all respect, I think that assumption shows a touch of ignorance of what lies past the Pat Robertsons. There are thousands of outreach programs across the country where church members go into their community to try and help. My own church, though impoverished, does this.
I'm no American, but I keep up with the Presidential Election news, and I agree with you.
wow, thumbs up. great post and great viewpoint
Hiiii! I stumbled upon this by request, and I got to say, I agree with you. However, I still want a Christian president. Lol.
And I was one of the Huckabee hopefuls because to me, he was the only one with any sense of morals in this campaign.
May the best man (or woman) win. =)
Much madd love,
Christian
I stumbled upon this by request and i give you kudos on a great post. I don't know if I would consider myself a Christian anymore, but I have grown up as one. I am also, at the same time a pro gay rights, pro options (notice i did not use pro choice due to the fact that people stereotype the meaning, and also i for me, liberal views on the issue are also due to the fact that its not only abortion but also other reproductive rights views that lead to my liberal leaning views on the issue), pro stem cell research person. To me it is about equality as humans. And I don't see a lot of republican candidates who believe in that. Its not only on those issues, but also things like health care, education, and taxes. Those come down to equal opportunity.
But with that being said, I don't think Jesus would be a party line kind of man. I think he would live by love and compassion and equality, and vote by those same guidelines.
Thats not to say who he would choose. I have my personal views, but I am not Jesus, so I can't say. So if I die and go to heaven anytime soon, I will let you know what he says.
Stumbled on your site. Well said! =)
Very well put. I am not Christian, but would certainly reconsider the entire message if more of them were as reasonable and insightful as yourself. Obviously something about it is working right in you. What a wonderful way to witness!
@pxrxcowgirl - On pro-options, with me it is abortion to save life, supposedly legal here. My adopted daughter has very severe disabilities that prevent her living to full term. To her, pregnancy is (without question) fatal. She was raped and carrying triplets and red tape due to restrictive laws very nearly killed her. God did what man would not, but she never fully recovered from the miscarries.
Was pointed to this blog entry and I agree with your opinion completely. 2008 is shaping up to be one interesting election year...
Jesus would put Abraham Lincoln back in the office
@M_i_k_E_k_i_M - LOL! oh man, that's too good.
@BADBOYDOOMDADDY - it is the same in my opinion. i am sorry to hear about the situation your daughter was in. those are things that should never happen, and there should be options for those situations. also, i was raped and fearing pregnancy, and though i did not have a medical reason to keep me from carry a pregnancy, i started considering abortion because it would have been so tramatic to carry a child and have that daily reminder of what happened. thank god i was not pregnant, so i didnt have to make the decision because it would have been a hard one.
and what i say regarding pro options, i think there is so much more to it, as i said, than abortion. there is also contraception, which alot of prolife people and organizations want to take away access to. also, sex education... abstinance only ed is proven not to work... why not teach safe sex and give kids all the options?
i could go on for ages on this topic...
I think it just goes back to that old concept of women being the property of men. They aren't suited to make decisions concerning there own body because it isn't theirs. It belongs to the male figure or the masculine God figure. Either way, it is wrong thinking. We should feel love for God as we do a mate. Being owned is not conducive to that. Thankfully that consciousness is fading, but lingers. It isn't for man to say what is right in such situations. It must be left to the individual. In your case, for example, how unfair it would be to a child to be brought up in a relationship where one couldn't surmount the grief and horror of rape. I can't even imagine what it would be like being a victim, but it was nearly more than I could bear it happening to one I love so much.
We don't need a president that follows the Bible. We need one that wholeheartedly believes in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Jesus would prolly have faith in everyone, and as such he would probably vote for them all *lol*. He's allowed to do that, isn't he? ^.^ I mean, c'mon, he's Jesus!! Jesus owns!
Although that reminds me of something that makes me laugh every time...
Google = Jesus
no... no, wait...
Google > Jesus
Jesus can't do your math homework, LAWL!
Jesus would vote for Lao Tzu.
Great post! I think Christians often get side-tracked into arguments and debates about unimportant or less important issues, rather than just trying to lead a Christ-like life.
@Amarisa - It's a shame Ron Paul isn't in the running anymore.
I like the point you made about personal responsibilities of the individuals being as important or more important than the responsibilities of the government.
Oh, but Lao Tzu wouldn't take him up on the offer, now that I think about it. Maybe if Jesus himself were President... hmmm... or Buddha.
I'd say maybe Ghandi, but he was a racist, so that wouldn't go over well.
hmm...well I did just have a comment here...but it went poof when I clicked submit...
It said something about how I have kinda been of the belief that certain parts of our laws/general morality can't/shouldn't be changed yet, because despite what we may believe, not everybody does, and so we can't expect them to follow it just because we think they should.
And very nice contrast of what Jesus actually did versus what people expect!
Great post. It made me laugh a bit, and you've certainly got a point.